General Questions

User avatar
Sir_L_Jenkins
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by Sir_L_Jenkins »

cypressfalls_Robert wrote:
Sir_L_Jenkins wrote:
rocketchicka wrote:When the rules say mass, as in "the motor must move a mass for ten seconds," what do they mean? A mass weight or just anything that has mass? :?:
Yeah, I think you can pretty much drag anything as long as it has mass. I would imagine it doesn't have to be a standardized weight or anything. I wonder if you could get away with having a fan blowing air, claiming that you're dragging the air, which does have mass after all =P. Although I wouldn't try it as it would be pushing the limit just a weee bit too much, but I would love to see that. It's a shame you can't do parallel tasks, or else you could do that and the fan step all at once!
so that's what parrallel tasks means, thought it was two tasks at once like side by side... *hits himself*
Err, well the parallel tasks do mean two steps side by side. Like you have a mousetrap that pulls out block A while also pulling out pin B of something else, which then starts two separate tasks at the same time. I guess what I was saying was combining the two tasks together, so it would technically be a parallel task, doing two different steps at once, but only using one motor to do those two steps.
*Ahem*
Mentlegen.
User avatar
aubrey048
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:43 am
Division: C
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by aubrey048 »

How can you possibly have a "tiebreaker" for mission possible? :| I'm curious, in the event my team is tied with someone else.
Plotting the function of the universe for efficiency without your permission.

Projected 2011-2012 Events: Anatomy, Microbe Mission, Disease Detectives, Tower, Optics, Helicopter.
Past Events: Anatomy (7th), Helicopter (6th), Mission Possible (1st), Write It Do It (4th, 8th), Ornithology (5th).
rockhound
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by rockhound »

aubrey048 wrote:How can you possibly have a "tiebreaker" for mission possible? :| I'm curious, in the event my team is tied with someone else.
Most likely times are not exactly the same or if they are the same then one team had a flag raised higher.
User avatar
aubrey048
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:43 am
Division: C
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by aubrey048 »

I did actually read about a tiebreaker somewhere. Not sure if it was online or not. Anyway, that would be pretty absurd to get the EXACT same time as someone else . . . :lol:
Plotting the function of the universe for efficiency without your permission.

Projected 2011-2012 Events: Anatomy, Microbe Mission, Disease Detectives, Tower, Optics, Helicopter.
Past Events: Anatomy (7th), Helicopter (6th), Mission Possible (1st), Write It Do It (4th, 8th), Ornithology (5th).
User avatar
Sir_L_Jenkins
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by Sir_L_Jenkins »

aubrey048 wrote:I did actually read about a tiebreaker somewhere. Not sure if it was online or not. Anyway, that would be pretty absurd to get the EXACT same time as someone else . . . :lol:
well, the final tiebreaker is the height of the flagpole, and since the judges are supposed to truncate the times I believe to the closest second, if you have max points, that means you automatically get down to the flagpole tiebreaker, which will most likely happen at state, and definitely nationals.
*Ahem*
Mentlegen.
rockhound
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by rockhound »

Sir_L_Jenkins wrote:well, the final tiebreaker is the height of the flagpole, and since the judges are supposed to truncate the times I believe to the closest second, if you have max points, that means you automatically get down to the flagpole tiebreaker, which will most likely happen at state, and definitely nationals.
Unfortunately time is not that way for the tiebreaker. http://soinc.org/node/473

•12/22/2009 - 09:01 Points and penalties seem to be awarded based on “full” seconds of operation. Is that also true for the second tie breaker?
No. Timing points and penalties are awarded based upon full seconds (not rounded seconds). The second tie breaker uses partial seconds.
So yay, your device gets to be rate based on the judges reaction time on a stopwatch to fractions of a second. :evil:
User avatar
Sir_L_Jenkins
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by Sir_L_Jenkins »

rockhound wrote:
Sir_L_Jenkins wrote:well, the final tiebreaker is the height of the flagpole, and since the judges are supposed to truncate the times I believe to the closest second, if you have max points, that means you automatically get down to the flagpole tiebreaker, which will most likely happen at state, and definitely nationals.
Unfortunately time is not that way for the tiebreaker. http://soinc.org/node/473
Oh wow, that is quite unfortunate, but that's really stupid as the exact instant where your flagpole comes up is totally subjective. I was talking to uncle fester at build it day a while back for that, and he said the final times were truncated as well for that tiebreaker, but perhaps things changed then. If that was true, then the final tiebreaker would be almost impossible to happen depending on how many sig figs, no matter how inaccurate, the judges decide to use.
*Ahem*
Mentlegen.
Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: General Questions

Post by Flavorflav »

Sir_L_Jenkins wrote:
rockhound wrote:
Sir_L_Jenkins wrote:well, the final tiebreaker is the height of the flagpole, and since the judges are supposed to truncate the times I believe to the closest second, if you have max points, that means you automatically get down to the flagpole tiebreaker, which will most likely happen at state, and definitely nationals.
Unfortunately time is not that way for the tiebreaker. http://soinc.org/node/473
Oh wow, that is quite unfortunate, but that's really stupid as the exact instant where your flagpole comes up is totally subjective. I was talking to uncle fester at build it day a while back for that, and he said the final times were truncated as well for that tiebreaker, but perhaps things changed then. If that was true, then the final tiebreaker would be almost impossible to happen depending on how many sig figs, no matter how inaccurate, the judges decide to use.
That's exactly right. The clarification therefore effectively nullifies a perfectly good tiebreaker, height, in favor of a highly questionable one. I can't think of any reason for it. It's pretty hard to imagine two devices with exactly the same height.
User avatar
Sir_L_Jenkins
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by Sir_L_Jenkins »

Aye, my team and I were having fun with coming up with really creative flagpoles for that tiebreaker, but if the time comes before that, then the flagpole height really doesn't matter at all until you reach a competition with a very large group of max scores. It would make a lot more sense to reverse the two, have flagpole height as a primary, or secondary tiebreaker, then exact time after that if needed, or just use truncated/rounded times. It would take a lot more skill to vary the height of your flagpole, but the exact time is more or less subjective to the judge, and I would assume most Missions can't control their timing of the device down to a tenth, or hundredth of a second. This could be really annoying in nationals where a lot of teams I would assume can obtain max points, thus it would all go down to the judge's decision/competency on the timing. This is a rube goldberg, not it's about time.

Oh well, I guess rules like these aren't exactly new to SO, haha. Complaining on the forums won't exactly make my device more reliable =P
*Ahem*
Mentlegen.
User avatar
sciencegeek100
Member
Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:10 am
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Questions

Post by sciencegeek100 »

jazzy009 wrote:Is MP a 3 person event?

Also, anyone who has done the event before, how did you create more surface area on your device? Just add boards vertical or horizontal?
since i have been in scioly i thought it was 2, although i did remember some teams having 3 go up for medals...
Nationals History...

2008: Team 1st, Rocks 2nd
2009: Team 3rd, Fossils 7th
2010: Team 5th, Fossils 4th, Ornithology 7th Egg o Naut 6th
2011: Team 4th, Ornithology 3rd
2012: Team 2nd (Assistant Coach)
2013: Team 3rd (Assistant Coach)

Return to “Mission Possible C”