Scioly Assassination 100: Mafia Reborn

[Makeithappen]

I AM THE ASSASSINATOR TROLOLOLOLOL

GRATZ SKINK PM ME YOUR CHOICE FOR THE NEXT SASSY.

Wait, so is the game over?

[Cedavis6]

I AM THE ASSASSINATOR TROLOLOLOLOL

GRATZ SKINK PM ME YOUR CHOICE FOR THE NEXT SASSY.

Wait, so is the game over?

With someting like TROLOLOLOL, I doubt it.

[Skink]

I AM THE ASSASSINATOR TROLOLOLOLOL

GRATZ SKINK PM ME YOUR CHOICE FOR THE NEXT SASSY.

Wait, so is the game over?

Of course not! Per rule 12, EFO isn't alone .

[EpicFailOlympian]

Yeah, me and Skink aren't ALL of the Assassinators....

[harryk]

OKAY, ACCUSATIONS ARE NOT JOKES. THIS IS FOR THE SASSIES AND THE OFFICERS.

I want people to look at this game like game 50. So, let's focus on the game, try to solve the clues, think logically about who the Sassies are, not have anymore posts like this, not stereotype the n00bs/ older players, be as helpful as you can, and HAVE FUN.

With love,
C

Actually though, in game 50, like many of the games, correct accusations rarely had anything to do with the clues and are based on speculation or wild guessing. Given the circumstances of this game, accusing all older yet still active players is not a bad place to start. If there really are multiple sassies, then I would be surprised if we haven't already accused at least one of them.

Also I have a feeling the clue is targeting paleonaps

[Cedavis6]

OKAY, ACCUSATIONS ARE NOT JOKES. THIS IS FOR THE SASSIES AND THE OFFICERS.

I want people to look at this game like game 50. So, let's focus on the game, try to solve the clues, think logically about who the Sassies are, not have anymore posts like this, not stereotype the n00bs/ older players, be as helpful as you can, and HAVE FUN.

With love,
C

Actually though, in game 50, like many of the games, correct accusations rarely had anything to do with the clues and are based on speculation or wild guessing. Given the circumstances of this game, accusing all older yet still active players is not a bad place to start. If there really are multiple sassies, then I would be surprised if we haven't already accused at least one of them.

Also I have a feeling the clue is targeting paleonaps

Note to self: don't refrence Sassy games you've never read.

[Littleboy]

This is to your own benefit -- they wouldn’t have done much for you anyway.

I suggest that we don't accuse any of the people that were just accused...at least not until yet.

Sassy, that rule serves no purpose besides just to annoy the heck out of the officers. Please remove pointless rules.
For example, lets say I wanted to accuse skystrider.
1) I could do one of the following:
"I accuse skystrider."
"I accuse skystrider because [insert a bunch of BS like is in most/all of my accusations]"
You see, I can still accuse someone and make it look like I put a lot of intelligence into that accusation if I wanted. It would just waste my time. Even if I had good proof, I still don't feel like writing it all out. In both cases, skystrider is accused.
2) It is very subjective on your decision of "intelligent." If you don't want that person to be accused, then you could just say that that accusation is invalid. Now really? Is that how we want to go through this game?
3)If an officer wants to accuse let them. It is not up to you to decide for them if they can accuse.
4) Often, the most fun parts of the game are semi-random accusations in the beginning. Do NOT prevent the natural flow of them game. It is less fun for everyone.
For these reasons and multiple more (sounds like reason 1 for why you should eliminate that terrible rule?) I request that you allow all accusations.

I don't like this. If this is anything like nap's and quiz game, it won't turn out great...I was hoping that we learned from that and would stick with 1 assassinator per game. Guess not.

[Skink]

Let it go. The officers have an idea...I think. Either way...

[Cedavis6]

Ok, this is getting annoying. Just let the Sassy enforce his rules. Please stop ranting.
Sassy, I may need a hint on this clue.

[aim4me26]

I protect paleonaps.