Mission Possible C

ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

Flavorflav wrote:Perhaps because I myself am saying nothing of the kind. The FAQ of 1/1 is clear:
"DOES RULE 3I IMPLY THAT ANY ELECTRICAL DEVICE WHICH OPERATES FOR MORE THAN TEN SECONDS WOULD BE A CONSTRUCTION VIOLATION?
Any type of electrical or spring action that operates for more than 10 seconds and still controls part of the action would be a violation"
The temperature sensor is operating for more than ten seconds and controls the termination of the action.
I disagree that the electrical component is what is controlling the action. I would say that the chemical reaction is. If the temperature never gets cold enough then the action fails. Action 1: chemical reaction decreases temp to 10 degrees C 2. sensor resistance increases past tipping point and signals microcontroller to begin the next action.

I'm not sure how else to explain it but I don't believe passive sensors that are active during a timer constitute a construction violation.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by daydreamer0023 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
Flavorflav wrote:Perhaps because I myself am saying nothing of the kind. The FAQ of 1/1 is clear:
"DOES RULE 3I IMPLY THAT ANY ELECTRICAL DEVICE WHICH OPERATES FOR MORE THAN TEN SECONDS WOULD BE A CONSTRUCTION VIOLATION?
Any type of electrical or spring action that operates for more than 10 seconds and still controls part of the action would be a violation"
The temperature sensor is operating for more than ten seconds and controls the termination of the action.
I disagree that the electrical component is what is controlling the action. I would say that the chemical reaction is. If the temperature never gets cold enough then the action fails. Action 1: chemical reaction decreases temp to 10 degrees C 2. sensor resistance increases past tipping point and signals microcontroller to begin the next action.

I'm not sure how else to explain it but I don't believe passive sensors that are active during a timer constitute a construction violation.
I'd also agree with you on this point Scott. I feel like this rule is trying to prevent teams from just having a built in "wait" timer or a spring timer (as the 5th place Nats device had in the last year Mission was a Division C event), since this would make having an accurate time "too easy."
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
Ash123
Member
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 9:17 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by Ash123 »

Is A timing step required? In one section of the rules it says you need t but in another it says it’s just for bonus points. What is the minimum time it needs to run, if required? I remember someone said they only included the start and final action and still competed with that.
dmis
Member
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2017 5:44 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by dmis »

Ash123 wrote:Is A timing step required? In one section of the rules it says you need t but in another it says it’s just for bonus points. What is the minimum time it needs to run, if required? I remember someone said they only included the start and final action and still competed with that.
It is not required. It must run for at least 30s to get bonus points.
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by PM2017 »

daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:
Flavorflav wrote:Perhaps because I myself am saying nothing of the kind. The FAQ of 1/1 is clear:
"DOES RULE 3I IMPLY THAT ANY ELECTRICAL DEVICE WHICH OPERATES FOR MORE THAN TEN SECONDS WOULD BE A CONSTRUCTION VIOLATION?
Any type of electrical or spring action that operates for more than 10 seconds and still controls part of the action would be a violation"
The temperature sensor is operating for more than ten seconds and controls the termination of the action.
I disagree that the electrical component is what is controlling the action. I would say that the chemical reaction is. If the temperature never gets cold enough then the action fails. Action 1: chemical reaction decreases temp to 10 degrees C 2. sensor resistance increases past tipping point and signals microcontroller to begin the next action.

I'm not sure how else to explain it but I don't believe passive sensors that are active during a timer constitute a construction violation.
I'd also agree with you on this point Scott. I feel like this rule is trying to prevent teams from just having a built in "wait" timer or a spring timer (as the 5th place Nats device had in the last year Mission was a Division C event), since this would make having an accurate time "too easy."
My feedback doesn't hold as much weight as the posts that I quoted -- since I'm relatively new to this type of thing -- but I agree with Scott here. The rules are almost asking you to use sensors. (or spend much more time, money and effort to get everything calibrated to perfection, which I don't think most teams can do).
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

PM2017 wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: I disagree that the electrical component is what is controlling the action. I would say that the chemical reaction is. If the temperature never gets cold enough then the action fails. Action 1: chemical reaction decreases temp to 10 degrees C 2. sensor resistance increases past tipping point and signals microcontroller to begin the next action.

I'm not sure how else to explain it but I don't believe passive sensors that are active during a timer constitute a construction violation.
I'd also agree with you on this point Scott. I feel like this rule is trying to prevent teams from just having a built in "wait" timer or a spring timer (as the 5th place Nats device had in the last year Mission was a Division C event), since this would make having an accurate time "too easy."
My feedback doesn't hold as much weight as the posts that I quoted -- since I'm relatively new to this type of thing -- but I agree with Scott here. The rules are almost asking you to use sensors. (or spend much more time, money and effort to get everything calibrated to perfection, which I don't think most teams can do).
Per Patrick Chalker the sensor is not an electrical timer but the chemical timer does not count for points. He also said that ESs should not double up on penalties and that the 150 penalty should be used instead of tiering.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
marvinl718
Member
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:03 pm
Division: C
State: VA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by marvinl718 »

So would using a temperature sensor detecting a decrease in temperature be perfectly legal for the endothermic action?
Fairfax High School
2017 Nationals: 4th Electric Vehicle
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

marvinl718 wrote:So would using a temperature sensor detecting a decrease in temperature be perfectly legal for the endothermic action?
Yes. Should be perfectly legal.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by PM2017 »

What about active sensors, like ping))) sensors? (I'm not actually using a Ping))) sensor, I'm just giving an example)
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

PM2017 wrote:What about active sensors, like ping))) sensors? (I'm not actually using a Ping))) sensor, I'm just giving an example)
Unsure on that
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80

Return to “Mission Possible C”