Mousetrap Vehicle C

GoldDigger
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:16 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by GoldDigger »

JasperKota wrote: As for axles: I'm currently using a hollow aluminum tube, but I read somewhere that it bends too much (haven't actually tested it yet), so maybe something like brass would work better although heavier. For the braking system, I'm using a steel 1/4 threaded rod and wingnut.
Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?
User avatar
JasperKota
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 8:01 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by JasperKota »

GoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?
I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestion
2020 Events: Fossils, Gravity Vehicle, Wright Stuff, Ping Pong Parachute
2019 Events: Fossils, Mousetrap Vehicle, Wright Stuff
2018 Events: Helicopters, Mousetrap Vehicle, Parasitology, WIDI
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Wright Stuff
2016 Events: Crave the Wave, Dynamic Planet, Invasives
shrewdPanther46
Member
Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:25 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by shrewdPanther46 »

JasperKota wrote:
GoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?
I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestion
My partner and I were considering this at one point for battery buggy. It should work in theory, and I have seen many incredibly strong and experienced competitors (cough cough windu :D ) use them. We decided not to use them for first few invitationals because our car is already light enough. However for mousetrap, idk the possible advantages
User avatar
windu34
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1367
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by windu34 »

shrewdPanther46 wrote:
JasperKota wrote:
GoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?
I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestion
My partner and I were considering this at one point for battery buggy. It should work in theory, and I have seen many incredibly strong and experienced competitors (cough cough windu :D ) use them. We decided not to use them for first few invitationals because our car is already light enough. However for mousetrap, idk the possible advantages
Yes CF rods for axles are the way to go
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?

Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...

I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.

Advice?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
Alex-RCHS
Member
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:46 pm
Division: Grad
State: NC
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by Alex-RCHS »

PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?

Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...

I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.

Advice?
I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.
About me!
Raleigh Charter HS (NC) 2018
UNC-Chapel Hill 2022
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

Alex-RCHS wrote:
PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?

Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...

I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.

Advice?
I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.
Do you think getting smaller wheels would work as well?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
Alex-RCHS
Member
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:46 pm
Division: Grad
State: NC
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by Alex-RCHS »

PM2017 wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:
PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?

Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...

I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.

Advice?
I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.
Do you think getting smaller wheels would work as well?
Oh yeah, that would probably be easier and lighter.
About me!
Raleigh Charter HS (NC) 2018
UNC-Chapel Hill 2022
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

I don't know if this has been discussed here, but in my school's robotics team, we are currently Andymark's 2in, 35 durometer compliant wheels. Do you guys think that these would work for MS vehicle?

https://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-3462_green.htm
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
dragonfruit35
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:49 am
Division: Grad
State: VA
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by dragonfruit35 »

PM2017 wrote:I don't know if this has been discussed here, but in my school's robotics team, we are currently Andymark's 2in, 35 durometer compliant wheels. Do you guys think that these would work for MS vehicle?

https://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-3462_green.htm
Do you have a way to attach them to your axles? If so, then probably, but from what I can tell from the picture they look like they might be a little heavy.
tjhsst '20
virginia tech '24
2x codebusters national medalist

"it's not a pen, it's a principle!" - annie edison

Return to “Mousetrap Vehicle C”