I would have to respectfully disagree. I think the key wording is not "utilize" or "any way," but rather "transfer." The rules state that "at State & National adjusting a TRANSFER that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation." As long as the energy transfer in question does not use electricity, it should be irrelevant whether other transfers nearby do. For example, if the energy transfer that is being adjusted is mechanical to thermal, then that would not violate the rule (in my opinion), even if the previous transfer is electrical to mechanical and the next transfer is thermal to electrical. Obviously, the time task will not work correctly unless all previous and subsequent tasks work correctly, but to say that therefore none of those other tasks may involve electricity seems (to me) silly.aahs_so wrote:Does your time task "utilize" electricity in ANY WAY (my emphasis) at the end of the timer operation?
Mission Possible C
-
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:35 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
-
- Member
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:34 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: KY
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
So far, no one has questioned my Mission. Although it may seem to be dangerously integrated with electricity, I could make something that would preform the same functions of starting and ending it. I think this falls under the thought that I wouldn't need to calculate the time it takes for something to bump a switch, probably a fraction of a second.an_so_student wrote:I would have to respectfully disagree. I think the key wording is not "utilize" or "any way," but rather "transfer." The rules state that "at State & National adjusting a TRANSFER that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation." As long as the energy transfer in question does not use electricity, it should be irrelevant whether other transfers nearby do. For example, if the energy transfer that is being adjusted is mechanical to thermal, then that would not violate the rule (in my opinion), even if the previous transfer is electrical to mechanical and the next transfer is thermal to electrical. Obviously, the time task will not work correctly unless all previous and subsequent tasks work correctly, but to say that therefore none of those other tasks may involve electricity seems (to me) silly.aahs_so wrote:Does your time task "utilize" electricity in ANY WAY (my emphasis) at the end of the timer operation?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
-
- Member
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:57 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
If the electrical part is designed to take up time, then do not use it. If the electrical part triggers is it or activates it, then it is fine. You just need to make sure that in your ETL where you have the time task that it doesn't say electrical anywhere in that step(s). That's what they look at.
Medal Counter: 73
-
- Member
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:34 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: KY
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
Likely yes. This is the first year, and events usually run two years before being discontinued.jdramsso wrote:Does anyone know whether this event will be continued next year?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
-
- Member
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:56 am
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
What are you guys getting for scores this year, i had 922 and was wondering if thats good?
Also does anyone know how to incorporate EMS into a device? What are the rest of you doing?
Also does anyone know how to incorporate EMS into a device? What are the rest of you doing?
2012 state Events
Anatomy and Physiology: 6
Disease Detectives: 3
Microbe Mission: 21
Protein Modeling: 2
"As government expands, liberty contracts" - Ronald Reagan
Anatomy and Physiology: 6
Disease Detectives: 3
Microbe Mission: 21
Protein Modeling: 2
"As government expands, liberty contracts" - Ronald Reagan
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 10:38 pm
- Division: C
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
1.Yes that score is about average.rkoopma2 wrote:What are you guys getting for scores this year, i had 922 and was wondering if thats good?
Also does anyone know how to incorporate EMS into a device? What are the rest of you doing?
2. Yes
3. One way to come up with transfers is to use your knowledge of physics and engineering. Think basic, what do electromagnetic waves do, then find some where it could be applied.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:06 pm
- Division: C
- State: ND
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
Is it ok to have a led light up in your device for a photocell before starting . the rule 3.n. "Energy devices (e.g.,Batteries, mousetraps,candles ) ,except motors, may be activated prior to starting the device.".
-
- Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:20 pm
- Division: C
- State: WI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
I believe that it is. An led light would be considered an energy device which is not a motor. In my mission, I had flashlights starting on, and I never had an issue with that.loganmcc wrote:Is it ok to have a led light up in your device for a photocell before starting . the rule 3.n. "Energy devices (e.g.,Batteries, mousetraps,candles ) ,except motors, may be activated prior to starting the device.".
-
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:22 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
For timing if we exceed the specified time, do we get all the points up to the specified time (2 pt for each second) AND THEN the penalty? Or do we get JUST the penalty (-1 pt for every second exceeding)?
Ex:
Specified time: 100 sec. (90.1 to 120.0 at Nationals)
Tested time: 110 sec.
Do we get 100*2 - 10*1 = 190 pts
OR
-10*1 = -10 pts.
Ex:
Specified time: 100 sec. (90.1 to 120.0 at Nationals)
Tested time: 110 sec.
Do we get 100*2 - 10*1 = 190 pts
OR
-10*1 = -10 pts.
Last edited by drifter601 on Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My dream car (in profile picture): a Nissan Skyline GTR R34...