Was it in relation to a DSO, or was it just some general type of object? Maybe it could relate to an OB assocation?darkwinters wrote:There was a question that came up today that I remember also came up a while ago, but I wasn't quite able to dig it up from my notes.
"This object contains many Type II Supernovae remnants along with many Class O stars" (or something to that effect).
Astronomy C
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:45 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Astronomy C
B: Crave the Wave, Environmental Chemistry, Robo-Cross, Meteo, Phys Sci Lab, Solar System, DyPlan (E and V), Shock Value
C: Microbe Mission, DyPlan (Fresh Waters), Fermi Questions, GeoMaps, Grav Vehicle, Scrambler, Rocks, Astro
Grad: Writing Tests/Supervising (NY/MI)
C: Microbe Mission, DyPlan (Fresh Waters), Fermi Questions, GeoMaps, Grav Vehicle, Scrambler, Rocks, Astro
Grad: Writing Tests/Supervising (NY/MI)
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:10 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
I'm still slightly confused...say my latitude is 41 and I'm using one of the DSOs from this year, Mira, which has a right ascension of 02h 19m 20.79210s and a declination of –02° 58′ 39.4956″ and I'm in the Northern Hemisphere...How would I go about doing it?If you have the latitude of the city and the declinations of the objects, you can determine the maximum altitude. In the northern hemisphere, it is possible to see objects with a declination of greater than the latitude minus 90 degrees, or in the southern hemisphere, (with a negative latitude sign) a maximum of the latitude plus 90 degrees.
Would I take 90-41 to get 49 which is my co-latitude
and then add my co-latitude to my declination which would be 49-2=47
and soooo...it should theoretically be visible sometime during the year?
I used this to help me-> http://kvmagruder.net/bcp/sphere/d.htm
Am I doing this correct? Thanks!
-
- Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:14 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
It was a DSO.syo_astro wrote:Was it in relation to a DSO, or was it just some general type of object? Maybe it could relate to an OB assocation?darkwinters wrote:There was a question that came up today that I remember also came up a while ago, but I wasn't quite able to dig it up from my notes.
"This object contains many Type II Supernovae remnants along with many Class O stars" (or something to that effect).
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:10 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: KS
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: Astronomy C
That looks correct.Asteroidea wrote: I'm still slightly confused...say my latitude is 41 and I'm using one of the DSOs from this year, Mira, which has a right ascension of 02h 19m 20.79210s and a declination of –02° 58′ 39.4956″ and I'm in the Northern Hemisphere...How would I go about doing it?
Would I take 90-41 to get 49 which is my co-latitude
and then add my co-latitude to my declination which would be 49-2=47
and soooo...it should theoretically be visible sometime during the year?
I used this to help me-> http://kvmagruder.net/bcp/sphere/d.htm
Am I doing this correct? Thanks!
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Astronomy C
My best guess would be Trapezium, like Mr. Cicc said -- a bright cluster of O/B stars and many young protostars. Definitely conceivable that some are forming from the remnants of the more massive stars in the cluster.darkwinters wrote:It was a DSO.syo_astro wrote:Was it in relation to a DSO, or was it just some general type of object? Maybe it could relate to an OB assocation?darkwinters wrote:There was a question that came up today that I remember also came up a while ago, but I wasn't quite able to dig it up from my notes.
"This object contains many Type II Supernovae remnants along with many Class O stars" (or something to that effect).
There is also a remote possibility that it could be attempting to refer to Eta Carinae, though it's a bit of a stretch as the question would have to be referring to the entire Carina Nebula instead of Eta Car itself.
Hershey Science Olympiad 2009 - 2014
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
-
- Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:24 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
Does anyone know where a good complete list of all the objects in the Henry Draper catalogue can be found? I've been able to find most of the other important star catalogues we might need to use.
-
- Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 6:43 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
So why use B-V index to find temperature of a star when you can use Wien's law? What is the point of B-V index besides finding Temp?
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:10 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: KS
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: Astronomy C
For one, from an observational standpoint, one can measure B-V index with just two magnitude measurements with a B and a V filter, as opposed to needing a full spectrometer to use Wien's law. Otherwise, it is just another way to measure temperature/color of a star to my knowledge.Smithy0013 wrote:So why use B-V index to find temperature of a star when you can use Wien's law? What is the point of B-V index besides finding Temp?
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:44 pm
- Division: C
- State: AZ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
Isn't Wien's law more common to use (at least on Scioly tests)? On my state test a few weeks ago I remember seeing two maximum wavelength to temperature problems but zero B-V color index questions. That being said, you'll regularly see B-V color on the X-axis of H-R diagrams.Schrodingerscat wrote:For one, from an observational standpoint, one can measure B-V index with just two magnitude measurements with a B and a V filter, as opposed to needing a full spectrometer to use Wien's law. Otherwise, it is just another way to measure temperature/color of a star to my knowledge.Smithy0013 wrote:So why use B-V index to find temperature of a star when you can use Wien's law? What is the point of B-V index besides finding Temp?
Also, can anybody help me with a quick binary system question. When I went to take the Arizona astro test there were two questions were they gave us the velocity of a binary system, the average rotational period of the two objects, and the mass of one of the objects. From there they asked us to calculate the mass of the second object. Thanks!
2012 Season: Reach for the Stars-3rd (State) / Keep the Heat-19th (State)
2013 Season: Astronomy-2nd (State) / Disease Detectives-15th (State)
2014 Season: Astronomy-1st (State) / Experimental Design-20th (State)/ Anatomy and Physiology-16th (State)
2015 Season: Astronomy
Thunder
2013 Season: Astronomy-2nd (State) / Disease Detectives-15th (State)
2014 Season: Astronomy-1st (State) / Experimental Design-20th (State)/ Anatomy and Physiology-16th (State)
2015 Season: Astronomy
Thunder