Standardization on the Wiki
Posted: June 16th, 2011, 9:04 pm
There are a few standardization issues on the wiki that bother me. I have started editing, and will continue editing them, but I wanted to share my concerns.
There does not seem to be an emphasis on writing in an informative way... I often see articles written in first person or addressing the reader as "you".
There is not a standard way of dealing with events which have multiple topics, but the prevailing way does not seem ideal. My suggestion is that if you look up an event with multiple topics, the page with the events title should serve as a disambiguation page for directing the user to what they are looking for, or as as well as a page with general non-specific event information. (including event rotation patterns, history, and consistent event format) This is the case with Anatomy. However, some events just redirect to the most recent event topic, such as Dynamic Planet redirecting to Earth's Fresh Water. There should be a page with information describing what Dynamic Planet in general. However, I would like to point out it would make sense to link to the current topic from the main page, instead of just redirecting Dynamic Planet. Meteorology has the same issue as Dynamic Planet. Astronomy has the current topic on the event page while putting past topics on pages titled accordingly. Why doesn't the current topic have it's own page as well, so that "Astronomy" can describe the event in general? Junkyard Challenge does not have separate pages for its topics, it just contains previous years' topics in spoiler tags.
Another issue I see is that event pages are not being kept up-to-date on their titles. For some reason it has become standard to redirect new event titles back to old event pages rather than moving the old pages to the new titles. To keep everything up-to-date Science Crime Busters should be moved to Crime Busters, Physical Science Lab to Wind Power, etc.
I hope you thoughtfully consider my suggestions.
There does not seem to be an emphasis on writing in an informative way... I often see articles written in first person or addressing the reader as "you".
There is not a standard way of dealing with events which have multiple topics, but the prevailing way does not seem ideal. My suggestion is that if you look up an event with multiple topics, the page with the events title should serve as a disambiguation page for directing the user to what they are looking for, or as as well as a page with general non-specific event information. (including event rotation patterns, history, and consistent event format) This is the case with Anatomy. However, some events just redirect to the most recent event topic, such as Dynamic Planet redirecting to Earth's Fresh Water. There should be a page with information describing what Dynamic Planet in general. However, I would like to point out it would make sense to link to the current topic from the main page, instead of just redirecting Dynamic Planet. Meteorology has the same issue as Dynamic Planet. Astronomy has the current topic on the event page while putting past topics on pages titled accordingly. Why doesn't the current topic have it's own page as well, so that "Astronomy" can describe the event in general? Junkyard Challenge does not have separate pages for its topics, it just contains previous years' topics in spoiler tags.
Another issue I see is that event pages are not being kept up-to-date on their titles. For some reason it has become standard to redirect new event titles back to old event pages rather than moving the old pages to the new titles. To keep everything up-to-date Science Crime Busters should be moved to Crime Busters, Physical Science Lab to Wind Power, etc.
I hope you thoughtfully consider my suggestions.