Scioly.org

Discussion for Ecology B/C.
Ecology Wiki
2010 Thread

So, Taiga and Tundra then.

paleonaps95 wrote:So, Taiga and Tundra then.

Indeed, indeed.
for whomever has the rules, are there any significant changes?

quizbowl13 wrote:

paleonaps95 wrote:So, Taiga and Tundra then.

Indeed, indeed.
for whomever has the rules, are there any significant changes?

Only that for regional and state competitions, general ecology questions should be mainly on local/regional ecology.

amerikestrel wrote:

quizbowl13 wrote:

paleonaps95 wrote:So, Taiga and Tundra then.

Indeed, indeed.
for whomever has the rules, are there any significant changes?

Only that for regional and state competitions, general ecology questions should be mainly on local/regional ecology.

we're still allowed a binder"?

We were never allowed a binder to my knowledge.
And also, how does that work with the local thingy? We should focus on "local" taiga and tundra, or ignore them until nationals.

paleonaps95 wrote:We were never allowed a binder to my knowledge.
And also, how does that work with the local thingy? We should focus on "local" taiga and tundra, or ignore them until nationals.

The general ecology part of the event should be local, not the biome part.

Got it. That makes much more sense, because only Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and Alaska would really stand a chance!

paleonaps95 wrote:We were never allowed a binder to my knowledge.
And also, how does that work with the local thingy? We should focus on "local" taiga and tundra, or ignore them until nationals.

whoops. confusing this with somethin else.

We were allowed a notes sheet, though. Are we allowed that this year?