Ill say 13.75kgs for the heck of it. It really all depends on these "key pieces.frontlineballer1 wrote:. anyways just let me know what you think it will get. woever is closest i will tell in private some secrets and techniques to it. P.S. there are some key pieces i left off when showing you guys so you cant just copy it
Elevated Bridge B/C
- smartkid222
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: June 22nd, 2008, 8:12 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009

2010 NY Helicopter Champ
-
- Coach
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009
Well, back from Regionals (N. Colorado).
First, B Div vs C Div.
Based on this, I’m at least wondering about my assumption of significantly higher efficiencies possible in B. I still think that some really good design and building skills applied to the B specs could outscore even a well done C bridge, but, hey, even after a lot of years , you learn something new almost every day.
B top 5- 607.3 (24.7g @ 15kg), 571.7(26.1@15kg), 485.2 (29g@14.07), 441.0, and 408.5
C top 5 1013.5 (14.8g @15kg), 826.9(12.4g @10.2K), 488.4 (24.5g @11.96kg), 477.7 (31.4g @ 15kg), and 471.8.
I’ll be very interested to hear what dholdgreve reports.
Ours (C-Div) weighed in at 14.8; we thought it would carry full load; it did without really breathing hard; some testing with a safety tower next week to see what it’ll really do, and where first failure mode will come from. Ver 2.0 should see testing soon, too; it’s a few grams lighter. There were 3 other bridges <14.8 gr; the lightest at 10.4, but the highest they scored was 402.9
It was a fun day
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
First, B Div vs C Div.
Based on this, I’m at least wondering about my assumption of significantly higher efficiencies possible in B. I still think that some really good design and building skills applied to the B specs could outscore even a well done C bridge, but, hey, even after a lot of years , you learn something new almost every day.
B top 5- 607.3 (24.7g @ 15kg), 571.7(26.1@15kg), 485.2 (29g@14.07), 441.0, and 408.5
C top 5 1013.5 (14.8g @15kg), 826.9(12.4g @10.2K), 488.4 (24.5g @11.96kg), 477.7 (31.4g @ 15kg), and 471.8.
I’ll be very interested to hear what dholdgreve reports.
Ours (C-Div) weighed in at 14.8; we thought it would carry full load; it did without really breathing hard; some testing with a safety tower next week to see what it’ll really do, and where first failure mode will come from. Ver 2.0 should see testing soon, too; it’s a few grams lighter. There were 3 other bridges <14.8 gr; the lightest at 10.4, but the highest they scored was 402.9
It was a fun day
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
-
- Coach
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009
Yeah, almost all of them did; relatively large x-section wood, bracing where it really didn't need to be. There were a couple with decent weights, that looked well conceived and executed, but they just didn't carry much load. Technique is clearly a factor; it takes time to get the skills, and learn a few tricks.
From both my boys' Jr Hi days, my sense of the B field was there were some folk who had worked hard, who had put at least some good thought into design- who understood some basics - and my hat's off to them, but nobody who.....is on the path to National -level competitiveness.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
From both my boys' Jr Hi days, my sense of the B field was there were some folk who had worked hard, who had put at least some good thought into design- who understood some basics - and my hat's off to them, but nobody who.....is on the path to National -level competitiveness.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 961
- Joined: January 12th, 2007, 7:36 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009
No doubt they were overbuilt. Looking at B specs there's no way 24+ g of balsa is necessary. And since the top two held the full 15, chances are they could hold more, which means they were overbuilt. Don't even need to see the bridges - the numbers say it all.
-
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 16th, 2007, 1:34 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009
For those of you that were wondering my bridge that i once had a picture of it up weighed in at about 8.2 grams. and it usually holds just over 13 kg. unfortunately for my competition i was in the last time black and it was in a very humid room so it picked up a lot of weight. just about .8 grams. it consisted of almost entirely basswood except the legs were 1/8" balsa. Also the legs were exactly how they were on my final bridge so yeah all your speculations were innaccurate. In fact i made this little test base were i attached the legs to a solid block of Oak. and set it up to load just to test how much the legs could hold. I filled up my 5 gallon bucket with water and it didnt fail. this is about 50lb of water. (i didnt have enough sand to break them). that just goes to show how amazing balsa can be in compression.
just to let you all know the person that was closest PM'ed me with almost exact specs. and also the mode of failure is the compression member (generally)
I would've liked to experiment more with some balsa in the design but i had other events to worry about so i didnt have as much time and focus as i wouldve liked for this event.
cheers.
just to let you all know the person that was closest PM'ed me with almost exact specs. and also the mode of failure is the compression member (generally)
I would've liked to experiment more with some balsa in the design but i had other events to worry about so i didnt have as much time and focus as i wouldve liked for this event.
cheers.
Last edited by frontlineballer1 on March 8th, 2009, 12:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 235
- Joined: April 1st, 2006, 11:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Elevated Bridge 2009
Back from Regionals:
The scores were extremely split for C division- The 3rd and 4th place teams were only 50pts apart, but they were separated from the 1st and 2nd place scores by >1000pts. I believe all the other bridges were second tiered for some reason or another, but their efficiencies still were only as high as 500 or so.
The scores were much closer for B divison: The top three places were between 1000 and 1100, and the designs were all almost identical (but these were different schools).
It'll be interesting to see how state goes... I'm guessing the gap in the C division scores won't be as large.
The scores were extremely split for C division- The 3rd and 4th place teams were only 50pts apart, but they were separated from the 1st and 2nd place scores by >1000pts. I believe all the other bridges were second tiered for some reason or another, but their efficiencies still were only as high as 500 or so.
The scores were much closer for B divison: The top three places were between 1000 and 1100, and the designs were all almost identical (but these were different schools).
It'll be interesting to see how state goes... I'm guessing the gap in the C division scores won't be as large.
Science Olympiad Alumna and Volunteer
Aia's Boomilever Guide: http://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Aia%27 ... ever_Guide
Aia's Boomilever Guide: http://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Aia%27 ... ever_Guide
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests