Scioly.org

This depends on your definition of competitive. Someone might say how good their teams do at nats, others might say how there are different teams at nats each year.

EASTstroudsburg13 wrote:

sewforlife wrote:Well. The school from NJ actually did get 3rd. so that shows people who thought NJ wasn't competitive

I didn't say it wasn't competitive, just that they were not as competitive as the "big five." Plus, one good team doesn't mean that much, it's based on the overall competitiveness of the state.

It wasn't you that said they weren't competitive. but anyway, croman is right, there is no real definition of competitive. Also, you should take in the factor that our state isn't as big as the "big five"

Let me put it this way. One good team does not a really competitive state make.