Scioly.org

P2P wrote:Does anyone know wind power raw scores for Div. C? Especially for the building portion?

Ashernoel wrote:

P2P wrote:Does anyone know wind power raw scores for Div. C? Especially for the building portion?

My friend does wind and says it depends on resistance so...

P2P wrote:I meant at state, should have been on the same testing setup. They also told us the scores afterwards.

Ashernoel wrote:

P2P wrote:I meant at state, should have been on the same testing setup. They also told us the scores afterwards.

idk what his score was but he said that it came down to one q on the test that was apparently hard between stevenson and us.

P2P wrote:

Ashernoel wrote:

P2P wrote:I meant at state, should have been on the same testing setup. They also told us the scores afterwards.

idk what his score was but he said that it came down to one q on the test that was apparently hard between stevenson and us.

Is he willing to pm me his building scores for state? I got 4th in the event

kaziscioly wrote:Anyone know what the top helicopter time was as well?

Trohans wrote:

HeavyHitter406 wrote:We have our first discrepancy...yesterday, as stated above, the rank for B division was Daniel Wright, Marie Murphy, SAA, and Twin Groves, in that order; SAA had a score of 150 with Twin Groves having a score roughly 15-20 points higher than that (I don't remember, specifically). However, Avogadro places Twin Groves ahead of SAA, 179-188. Anyone who was keeping track of events see where the scorers went wrong, and who is right?

I think it may have to do with factoring in the A team's into the final score. For example, DW had 48 overall. When the final scores came out, they had a 49 with a 6th in disease detectives instead of a fifth place. The team that got first in A in disease probably got in the top 5 overall, so DW was shifted down one place.

laneyoung wrote:

Trohans wrote:

HeavyHitter406 wrote:We have our first discrepancy...yesterday, as stated above, the rank for B division was Daniel Wright, Marie Murphy, SAA, and Twin Groves, in that order; SAA had a score of 150 with Twin Groves having a score roughly 15-20 points higher than that (I don't remember, specifically). However, Avogadro places Twin Groves ahead of SAA, 179-188. Anyone who was keeping track of events see where the scorers went wrong, and who is right?

I think it may have to do with factoring in the A team's into the final score. For example, DW had 48 overall. When the final scores came out, they had a 49 with a 6th in disease detectives instead of a fifth place. The team that got first in A in disease probably got in the top 5 overall, so DW was shifted down one place.

This is correct. If you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page with the combined scores you can get the "correct" link.