Scores B/C
Re: Scores B/C
They used buckets and cups, but there was a choice between loading either sand and ball-bearings.lukas wrote:Do you know if the testing apparatus at the MIT invitational was automatic or did they manually load the bucket using cups?
-
- Member
- Posts: 167
- Joined: December 28th, 2013, 10:59 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores B/C
Hmmm I've never seen ball bearings being used as the load before. Is there any advantage to using ball bearings over sand other than being easier to clean up?KayHill wrote:They used buckets and cups, but there was a choice between loading either sand and ball-bearings.lukas wrote:Do you know if the testing apparatus at the MIT invitational was automatic or did they manually load the bucket using cups?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Scores B/C
They are denser. Hence you can get up to full weight faster, with the hope that your bridge lasts long enough to be declared holding the full weight before deforming / breaking.DoctaDave wrote:Hmmm I've never seen ball bearings being used as the load before. Is there any advantage to using ball bearings over sand other than being easier to clean up?KayHill wrote:They used buckets and cups, but there was a choice between loading either sand and ball-bearings.lukas wrote:Do you know if the testing apparatus at the MIT invitational was automatic or did they manually load the bucket using cups?
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Coach
- Posts: 573
- Joined: February 6th, 2006, 2:20 pm
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Scores B/C
Just out of curiosity, what size are the bearings?
Dan Holdgreve
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
-
- Coach
- Posts: 573
- Joined: February 6th, 2006, 2:20 pm
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Scores B/C
CM? That would be like 1/2" to 1" in diameter, right?KayHill wrote:They are extremely small, perhaps 1-2cm in diameter if I had to guess.dholdgreve wrote:Just out of curiosity, what size are the bearings?
Dan Holdgreve
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
- chinesesushi
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: September 17th, 2013, 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Scores B/C
Our team opted to use sand under the knowledge that the sand was finer. And also, it seems like they were using some really light ball bearing because they seemed to load slower with ball bearings than sand.
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: May 10th, 2011, 8:25 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Scores B/C
Are you sure it wasn't just people freaking out about noise of ball bearings hitting the bottom and actually pouring them slower? Even the low density steel and the worst packing ratio is still more dense than sand.chinesesushi wrote:Our team opted to use sand under the knowledge that the sand was finer. And also, it seems like they were using some really light ball bearing because they seemed to load slower with ball bearings than sand.
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown
Re: Scores B/C
I apologize I mistyped, I meant mm, not cm. My team chose to use ball bearings and we actually found them easier, but we noticed multiple teams before us had a harder time balancing the bucket with the ball bearings so unless you know you can load well I would not recommend them.dholdgreve wrote:CM? That would be like 1/2" to 1" in diameter, right?KayHill wrote:They are extremely small, perhaps 1-2cm in diameter if I had to guess.dholdgreve wrote:Just out of curiosity, what size are the bearings?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests