Page 10 of 27

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 20th, 2018, 9:49 pm
by kenniky
Unome wrote:Results:

1. Troy A (101)
That was ridiculous.

An additional fun fact is that Troy A won over 1/3 of the events, with 8 golds.

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 20th, 2018, 10:09 pm
by windu34
kenniky wrote:
Unome wrote:Results:

1. Troy A (101)
That was ridiculous.

An additional fun fact is that Troy A won over 1/3 of the events, with 8 golds.
And medalled in 20/23 events :shock:

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 20th, 2018, 10:26 pm
by daydreamer0023
windu34 wrote:
kenniky wrote:
Unome wrote:Results:

1. Troy A (101)
That was ridiculous.

An additional fun fact is that Troy A won over 1/3 of the events, with 8 golds.
And medalled in 20/23 events :shock:
When the co-directors announced Troy's score, there was a collective gasp from the audience, which I found pretty amusing.

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 4:47 am
by Alex-RCHS
daydreamer0023 wrote:
windu34 wrote:
kenniky wrote: That was ridiculous.

An additional fun fact is that Troy A won over 1/3 of the events, with 8 golds.
And medalled in 20/23 events :shock:
When the co-directors announced Troy's score, there was a collective gasp from the audience, which I found pretty amusing.
Are they still going to hold a national tournament? Or should they just mail the trophy to Troy? :P

Edit: Also, this with Mason and Ohio. And where’s the form for the Mason bandwagon? I’m ready to hop on, but I haven’t been able to find it. (I mean that as a compliment to them lol, I’m rooting for them to take down Troy, as unlikely as that may be)

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 7:37 am
by antoine_ego
Top 10 conglomerates (taking best placing of each team by event):

1. Troy (95)
2. Mason (171)
3. Solon (224)

4. Harriton (228)
5. Seven Lakes (270)
6. Acton-Boxborough (275)

7. LASA (279)
8. Columbia (303)
9. Clements (361)
10. Chattahoochee (365)

Darn, #beatTroy2018 hasn't been realized yet.

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 9:17 am
by ScottMaurer19
antoine_ego wrote:I watched Troy's Mission. It was... Basically optimal. Congrats to them!
Willing to share details?

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 9:35 am
by fanjiatian
antoine_ego wrote:Top 10 conglomerates (taking best placing of each team by event):

1. Troy (95)
2. Mason (171)
3. Solon (224)

4. Harriton (228)
5. Seven Lakes (270)
6. Acton-Boxborough (275)

7. LASA (279)
8. Columbia (303)
9. Clements (361)
10. Chattahoochee (365)

Darn, #beatTroy2018 hasn't been realized yet.
To procrastinate on studying for exams, did the same analysis and here're the top 20 schools :P
1. Troy (95)
2. Mason (171)
3. Solon (224)
4. Harriton (228)
5. Seven Lakes (270)
6. Acton-Boxborough (275)
7. LASA (279)
8. Columbia (303)
9. William P. Clements (361)
10. Chattahoochee (365)
11. Ward Melville High School (387)
12. Montgomery High School (396)
13. Clark High School (415)
14. Eagle Independent / Enloe (417)
15. Conestoga High School (456)
16. Boca Raton High School (473)
17. Mentor High School (489)
18. Fairfax High School (503)
19. Syosset High School (571)
20. Olathe North High School (669)

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 10:03 am
by whythelongface
As quite a few people commented last night, it's as if Solon died. Mason did really well (congrats to them!). Had Centerville been there too, the results would likely be even more interesting, as it would provide a pretty handy indication of the top schools in Ohio and their bids for States.

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 1:02 pm
by antoine_ego
winchesetr wrote:Does anyone know if there's any truth to the rumor that MIT is not releasing blank digital copies of the tests to teams this year?
MIT is releasing them, however, they've gone to great lengths to prevent trading.

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Posted: January 21st, 2018, 1:15 pm
by QuantumEcho
antoine_ego wrote:
winchesetr wrote:Does anyone know if there's any truth to the rumor that MIT is not releasing blank digital copies of the tests to teams this year?
MIT is releasing them, however, they've gone to great lengths to prevent trading.
By any chance, does anyone know when they will be released?