Wright Stuff B

jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1638
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by jander14indoor »

Good ES will not touch or disassemble your plane. Unless you ask for help, then maybe.
Good ES will have one of a couple of methods of weight.
Electronic balance with a pre-tared stooge. It will have a clip of some sort to hold your plane by the motor stick.
Balance with hook and counterweight set to minimum weight. My preferred method, very quick, doesn't require power and I don't care what your plane weighs (you should) as long as it overbalances the counterweight. Know where you can hook your plane, typically behind the prop hook, not on the prop, it will spin and drop the plane or behind the wing posts. I use two, one for the plane, one for the rubber. And it avoids the problem that some electronic scales are sensitive to static on the rubber.

Not so good solutions.
Electronic scale with no stooge. Bring your own in case
3 or 4 beam balance with a small stage. Really doesn't work well and fortunately I haven't seen one in a while.

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
freed2003
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:00 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by freed2003 »

Does anyone know how many winds you can get with a fai tan 3/32 rubber? When I tried 1200 I think the know un winded itself so how could I fix that(I tied it the way they said in the freedom flight manual)
BEARSO/MIT/High Desert/Regionals/State?
Cybersecurity 3/ /2/1
Codebusters 6/2/1/1
Circuit lab 77/20/3/1
Machines / /2/1
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 743 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by bernard »

freed2003 wrote:Does anyone know how many winds you can get with a fai tan 3/32 rubber? When I tried 1200 I think the know un winded itself so how could I fix that(I tied it the way they said in the freedom flight manual)
When I was competing I could get 1470 winds in a 0.094" 2.00 g motor (approximately 1100 winds on a 1.50 g motor of same width). My mentor could get 1730 winds on the same motor (approximately 1300 winds on a 1.50 g motor). Jeff Anderson posted instructions for tying motors: viewtopic.php?f=245&t=9271&p=308340#p308365.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
bjt4888
Member
Member
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:35 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by bjt4888 »

freed2003,

Using the John Barker maximum turns equation, breaking turns for a 11" loop of .094" rubber would be about 1,439. You didn't mention loop length, but 11" would be about right for average density tan ss rubber (.083 g/in) and this is assuming that you are using two black rubber o-rings (.04 grams each).

Winding to about 90% of breaking turns and then backing off to launch torque needed to stay clear of the ceiling would be a pretty good strategy.

Brian T.
freed2003
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:00 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by freed2003 »

bjt4888 wrote:freed2003,

Using the John Barker maximum turns equation, breaking turns for a 11" loop of .094" rubber would be about 1,439. You didn't mention loop length, but 11" would be about right for average density tan ss rubber (.083 g/in) and this is assuming that you are using two black rubber o-rings (.04 grams each).

Winding to about 90% of breaking turns and then backing off to launch torque needed to stay clear of the ceiling would be a pretty good strategy.

Brian T.
Sorry, but what do you mean by "backing off", do you mean to unwind or wind until I get the the torque needed to stay clear of the ceiling?
BEARSO/MIT/High Desert/Regionals/State?
Cybersecurity 3/ /2/1
Codebusters 6/2/1/1
Circuit lab 77/20/3/1
Machines / /2/1
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 743 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by bernard »

freed2003 wrote:
bjt4888 wrote:freed2003,

Using the John Barker maximum turns equation, breaking turns for a 11" loop of .094" rubber would be about 1,439. You didn't mention loop length, but 11" would be about right for average density tan ss rubber (.083 g/in) and this is assuming that you are using two black rubber o-rings (.04 grams each).

Winding to about 90% of breaking turns and then backing off to launch torque needed to stay clear of the ceiling would be a pretty good strategy.

Brian T.
Sorry, but what do you mean by "backing off", do you mean to unwind or wind until I get the the torque needed to stay clear of the ceiling?
Yes, he means winding up to 90% of maximum winds (breakage) and then unwinding to your desired launch torque. This takes advantage of hysteresis (loss of energy) to have more winds. See viewtopic.php?f=191&t=6587&p=270417#p270417.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
freed2003
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:00 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by freed2003 »

How does the sli-slick lube fai tan sells compare to armor all or son of a gun?
BEARSO/MIT/High Desert/Regionals/State?
Cybersecurity 3/ /2/1
Codebusters 6/2/1/1
Circuit lab 77/20/3/1
Machines / /2/1
jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1638
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by jander14indoor »

Probably better, it was formulated for rubber, but not in any earth shattering way. It might gain a few seconds, might, on a 2:30 flight. Certainly it won't harm the rubber.

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
freed2003
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:00 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by freed2003 »

Thanks for the response.
Do you guys think 1/16 rubber is a must have or can I go by on just 3/32?
BEARSO/MIT/High Desert/Regionals/State?
Cybersecurity 3/ /2/1
Codebusters 6/2/1/1
Circuit lab 77/20/3/1
Machines / /2/1
User avatar
JasperKota
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 8:01 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Wright Stuff B

Post by JasperKota »

It depends on the plane. If you notice that you still have many winds left after your plane lands, it's unnecessary to go thinner, in fact you may want to go thicker. If your plane is optimally trimmed and it runs out of winds before it lands, you may want to switch to thinner rubber. Different rubber widths are good to experiment with, though, so I suggest getting ahold of a few different widths.
2020 Events: Fossils, Gravity Vehicle, Wright Stuff, Ping Pong Parachute
2019 Events: Fossils, Mousetrap Vehicle, Wright Stuff
2018 Events: Helicopters, Mousetrap Vehicle, Parasitology, WIDI
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Wright Stuff
2016 Events: Crave the Wave, Dynamic Planet, Invasives

Return to “Wright Stuff B”