Page 9 of 10

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: April 27th, 2014, 2:05 am
by bernard
chinesesushi wrote:I don't see why it wouldn't return to its original length.
Many slinkies have low enough spring constants so that the spring's own mass is enough to stretch it noticably.

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: April 27th, 2014, 2:08 am
by bernard
chinesesushi wrote:have you tried using a spring or slinky? those usually pass the elasticity test easily, depending on the stiffness of the spring
From my observations, I wouldn't recommend springs. I witnessed another team's spring tangle and ruin one of their drops. Though, if you can find a way so that it doesn't tangle, then by all means use it. I still have a preference for elastic cords (:

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: April 27th, 2014, 8:30 am
by chinesesushi
bernard wrote:
chinesesushi wrote:I don't see why it wouldn't return to its original length.
Many slinkies have low enough spring constants so that the spring's own mass is enough to stretch it noticably.
Even so, I used a spring at an invitational and it still had one of the highest elasticity. Over 300% i think.

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: April 30th, 2014, 12:08 pm
by Mathc314
Is anyone else thinking that the elasticity test tolerance level is going to be really low for nationals, thus weeding out the "not so good" teams, putting many in the fourth tier? I'm worried about that, do you think I should be? Any speculation is helpful...

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 1st, 2014, 4:42 am
by JonB
Mathc314 wrote:Is anyone else thinking that the elasticity test tolerance level is going to be really low for nationals, thus weeding out the "not so good" teams, putting many in the fourth tier? I'm worried about that, do you think I should be? Any speculation is helpful...
Are you referring to the bottom meter stretching to 1.25 w/ 500g? I feel this is pretty cut and dry. It either is or it isn't. If your device is that close to not meeting the requirements, then you might want to change it so there is not even room to be questioned.

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 7th, 2014, 8:04 am
by bugsrcool
When measuring the bungee, do they measure the bottom of the ring as the bottom of the cord or the lowest part of the bungee. We use two rubber bands and one is tight while the other is more loose for the added height. The second rubber band dangles below the ring while at rest.

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 7th, 2014, 12:20 pm
by chinesesushi
LOL, why would they measure it from the lowest part of your cord? I suggest you carefully examine rule clarifications: http://www.soinc.org/node/1318

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 21st, 2014, 3:50 pm
by BuildistFromTheNorth
After nationals I have come to an even stronger conclusion than before that a unified dropping system needs to be established. Crazy things were going down. How do y'all think the event will change next year?

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 21st, 2014, 5:36 pm
by chinesesushi
BuildistFromTheNorth, I agree. I saw you at the competition btw at bungee. I was wearing a tan colored shirt :D We've been talking to Bear and hopefully something will be done.

Re: Bungee Drop C

Posted: May 22nd, 2014, 4:38 am
by JonB
BuildistFromTheNorth wrote:After nationals I have come to an even stronger conclusion than before that a unified dropping system needs to be established. Crazy things were going down. How do y'all think the event will change next year?
Agreed. There seems to be many uncontrollable variables in this event. Additionally, throughout the year I had way too many students leaning over railing and out of windows which really was a concern.