Scioly.org

ouch...

foreverphysics wrote:quadratic insists on this...

quadratic wrote:Hmm a random number generator for a clue. PROTECT RANDOMPERSON ALREADY YOU THUNDERING MORONI apologize for my rudeness but I believe it was necessary.

So, I protect RandomPerson for reasons that quadratic gave me. And if you are wrong, quadratic, may you hang your head in shame and walk away...slowly and forever.

Pretty sure I'm dead.

I am disappointed with your lack of intellect.
I have passed my sword on to another.
This game is over.

Assassinator wrote:I have passed my sword on to another.

And in the interest of full disclosure, I was offered the sassy spot and turned it down.
/me looks around at the Psych flashcards scattered everywhere
I shouldn't have to justify why I turned it down.

That was abrupt.

The sassy games have become dull and monotonous to an extreme. Something needs to be done to change this.

I feel personally responsible for this. And I want to send out a message to any prospective assassinator:
Look- we all can have bad games. I've had two bad games, and one mediocre one. But you should never, ever use someone's level of suckage to justify your own. After 77 I could have said "Well, I did better than Liv all those games ago" but that would have been stupid and jerkish. If anyone thinks that because 77 sucked they can play a bad game they are horribly mistaken. I have to go back to studying Physics now, but I just want to say that the games are losing interest and fun. We need interesting games, probably themed, with good storytelling.
So, go and make good games. Shoo.