Page 9 of 16
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 11:41 am
by IdahoSciGuy
So, this was posted at 5:37 AM eastern time. Just saying, time might mean something
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:02 pm
by winneratlife
IdahoSciGuy wrote:So, this was posted at 5:37 AM eastern time. Just saying, time might mean something
Actually, it was posted at 6:37 EST
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:28 pm
by paleonaps
G6 could refer to the G group of stars, of which Alpha Centauri is a member.
Since I now have an accusation, I accuse AlphaTauri because of that.
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:32 pm
by IdahoSciGuy
ugh, i forgot to set my board preferences,I was on pacific time........-.-
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:38 pm
by AlphaTauri
paleonaps wrote:G6 could refer to the G group of stars, of which Alpha Centauri is a member.
Since I now have an accusation, I accuse AlphaTauri because of that.
You do know that Aldebaran (α tauri, from which my username derives) is a K5 III star...not a G6 (I'm assuming V) star?
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:39 pm
by IdahoSciGuy
paleonaps wrote:G6 could refer to the G group of stars, of which Alpha Centauri is a member.
Since I now have an accusation, I accuse AlphaTauri because of that.
Paleo, you do know that the star AlphaTauri isn't Alpha Centauri.......It's Aldeberan.
EDIT: Ironically, AlphaTauri beat me to it.
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:40 pm
by winneratlife
'naps, you're going to use all of our 15 at this rate...
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:42 pm
by Assassinator
For centuries, this great nation was at war with itself, deteriorating slowly. After over four hundred years of battle, one man overran all who opposed him and created an empire.
It is quite unfortunate that he was a tyrant.
KILLCLUE wrote:4179981326255363584
It is also quite unfortunate for you that paleonaps is wrong.
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 12:59 pm
by fmtiger124
aubrey048 wrote:prelude to death wrote:Assassinator wrote:I'm guessing this is for the kill clue. In that case, sure.
4/13/11 12:24
I was on at the time, but I wasn't looking at the Illinois thread. Didn't fmtiger124 say that the sassy posted
on the Illinois thread or something like that? So, is that the time that the sassy posted it (12:24)? I just looked at the Illinois thread, and I guess the sassy's post was deleted or something, because it wasn't there. Also, if the post existed, it would have been right before Cheesy Pie's post and right after Aubrey's. Finally, I remember Aubrey saying something about
being like, an inside joke or something on YDRC. Well, that's all I've got.
/me summons fmtiger
FM! YOUR CHAT LOGS!
Apr 13 16:08:09 <fmtiger124> sassy posted in the illinois thread
It's approximately around that time....at least that's when I noticed it
Re: Scioly Assassination 69: Rise of a Dynasty
Posted: April 14th, 2011, 1:12 pm
by Kokonilly
Assassinator wrote:For centuries, this great nation was at war with itself, deteriorating slowly. After over four hundred years of battle, one man overran all who opposed him and created an empire.
It is quite unfortunate that he was a tyrant.
KILLCLUE wrote:4179981326255363584
I'm assuming that means a Caesarian shift (but actually that doesn't make too much sense, as Caesar was dictator-for-life and not technically an emperor; but I guess Augustus Caesar was emperor).
So... Caesarian shift?
EDIT: ...uh, I actually don't know how ciphers work. But I'm sure this is one of some kind.
Wow, am I helpful.