PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

User avatar
sciolyperson1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1073
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 529 times
Been thanked: 601 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by sciolyperson1 »

Cow481 wrote:Have there been ny reports of div b teams that have a pretty good chance of going to nats getting over 2500?
-
Last edited by sciolyperson1 on Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
SoCal Planning Team & BirdSO Tournament Director
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
Vstorm34
Member
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 8:25 am
Division: C
State: VA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by Vstorm34 »

sciolyperson1 wrote:
Cow481 wrote:Have there been ny reports of div b teams that have a pretty good chance of going to nats getting over 2500?
At Cornell, the highest place a NY team got in boomi was 12th (Brother Fox). I'd guess around 700.
At Garnet, the highest place a NY team got in boomi was 7th (Bay C), with a score of just under 600.

So unless Gelinas, Murphy, Eagle, or Bay improved drastically, I don't think that anyone will go over 2500.
I think they just forgot the 'a' in the word "any"
User avatar
sciolyperson1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1073
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 529 times
Been thanked: 601 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by sciolyperson1 »

Vstorm34 wrote:
sciolyperson1 wrote:
Cow481 wrote:Have there been ny reports of div b teams that have a pretty good chance of going to nats getting over 2500?
At Cornell, the highest place a NY team got in boomi was 12th (Brother Fox). I'd guess around 700.
At Garnet, the highest place a NY team got in boomi was 7th (Bay C), with a score of just under 600.

So unless Gelinas, Murphy, Eagle, or Bay improved drastically, I don't think that anyone will go over 2500.
I think they just forgot the 'a' in the word "any"
lmao... (-‸ლ)
SoCal Planning Team & BirdSO Tournament Director
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
User avatar
mnoga
Member
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:12 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by mnoga »

mnoga wrote:
TheChiScientist wrote:
donutsandcupcakes wrote:Do you guys think anyone would come to nationals with 3000 efficiency? or close to it somewhere like 2800-3000?
I'm currently doing research into the feasibility of a 3000 boomilever but I would say that 3000 is a stretch as currently there has only been one report of a Div. C boom breaking 2k. So far research has been promising but otherwise, nothing stands out. As for Div. B, I would say that a 3000 boom is much more feasible.
Heard a report of a 2200+ boom in the C division today at the UCSB Regional (SoCal) from a very good source. I'll attempt to confirm.
Talked to my source and boom in question weighed approx. 6.7g and held maximum weight + a little extra.
User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by TheChiScientist »

mnoga wrote:
mnoga wrote:
TheChiScientist wrote: I'm currently doing research into the feasibility of a 3000 boomilever but I would say that 3000 is a stretch as currently there has only been one report of a Div. C boom breaking 2k. So far research has been promising but otherwise, nothing stands out. As for Div. B, I would say that a 3000 boom is much more feasible.
Heard a report of a 2200+ boom in the C division today at the UCSB Regional (SoCal) from a very good source. I'll attempt to confirm.
Talked to my source and boom in question weighed approx. 6.7g and held maximum weight + a little extra.
Impressive. My 2k boom ran on near similar specs but it didn't hold all the weight. By any chance do you know what team it was? Nice to see that 2k is achievable.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
User avatar
mnoga
Member
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:12 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by mnoga »

TheChiScientist wrote:
mnoga wrote:
mnoga wrote:
Heard a report of a 2200+ boom in the C division today at the UCSB Regional (SoCal) from a very good source. I'll attempt to confirm.
Talked to my source and boom in question weighed approx. 6.7g and held maximum weight + a little extra.
Impressive. My 2k boom ran on near similar specs but it didn't hold all the weight. By any chance do you know what team it was? Nice to see that 2k is achievable.
I believe school was Oak Park
wzhang5460
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:53 pm
Division: B
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by wzhang5460 »

Cow481 wrote:Have there been ny reports of div b teams that have a pretty good chance of going to nats getting over 2500?
No. To what I know, Gelinas, Bay Academy, and Murphy have not broken 2500 yet.
Circuit Lab NY State Champion with legendary circuitologist Eric Wang
LONGEST DEFENDING ROCKS AND MINERALS REGIONAL CHAMPION OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND IN HISTORY ~4 YEARS AND COUNTING
sciencecat42
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by sciencecat42 »

Has anyone seen any trends between top scoring designs? Like are they the basic single two compression members with some lateral bracing, or are they compression boxes, tubes, bowed, etc.? Additionally, does vertical bracing (connecting compression to tension) do anything?
User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by TheChiScientist »

sciencecat42 wrote:Has anyone seen any trends between top scoring designs? Like are they the basic single two compression members with some lateral bracing, or are they compression boxes, tubes, bowed, etc.? Additionally, does vertical bracing (connecting compression to tension) do anything?
1. Well if varies but best boom designs to use are compression boxes.
2. Uh, the short answer is no. The long answer is kinda of. (All they really do is maintain your boom aligned)
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
sciencecat42
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by sciencecat42 »

TheChiScientist wrote: 1. Well if varies but best boom designs to use are compression boxes.
Thanks, that is nice to know. I've been building a few compression box designs but none have reached 1000 yet. Guess I'll keep building them.

Return to “Boomilever B/C”