Scioly.org

chopchpp wrote:

AlbatrossTree wrote:

allopathie wrote:Haven't posted in a while.

1. LASA
2. Clements
3. Harriton
4. WW-P North
5. Enloe
6. Acton-Boxborough
7. Columbia
8. Chattahoochee
9. Mentor
10. Bayard Rustin

Consistency is key!

I'd move Harriton up a spot but that's just me

I think he is saying Harriton (who got third last year) should stay consistent.

I understood. Just thinking that without Troy, Mason, Solon, etc. they might move up

1. Harriton
2. Clements
3. LASA
4. Acton-Boxborough
5. WW-P North
6. Enloe
7. Columbia
8. Mentor
9. Chattahoochee
10. Montgomery

1. Harriton
2. Clements
3. WWPN
4. Acton-Boxborough
5. LASA
6. Enloe
7. Mentor
8. Chattahochee
9. Columbia
10. Bayard

For all those putting Acton-Boxborough so high, keep in mind we always bring double unstacked teams.

antoine_ego wrote:For all those putting Acton-Boxborough so high, keep in mind we always bring double unstacked teams.

Subtle humbleness but appreciated - in all honesty, AB still probably deserves a top 10

I hope someone has made a medal tracking sheet, because I haven't (although you could always just copy the one I posted here).

antoine_ego wrote:For all those putting Acton-Boxborough so high, keep in mind we always bring double unstacked teams.

I just choose to assume that invitational predictions refer to manual stacked scores. It's kind of pointless to try to predict the actual team placement due to the difficulty in predicting how much any particular team will stack.

MIT Live Scoresheet

I will try my best to update it. I hope the wifi will be working.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

Good Luck to anyone attending tomorrow!


**Anyone who wants to help edit, PM me.**

Good luck to everyone at MIT tomorrow!

Good luck to everyone competing tomorrow! Feel free to stop by Mission in Lobdell before 7:30 am or after 4 pm if you'd like to meetup/chat!