Scioly.org

LittleMissNyan wrote: ↑January 30th, 2020, 1:26 pm So I think I might have come up with a general theory of sorts???

If you're using your freedom of _____ to take away someone else's freedom of _____ it's not freedom

What are freedoms anyways?

Whenever we sign contracts, or click "accept terms of usage", we (most times) sign away our freedoms unwittingly - and don't notice until it's too late.
Further, most of us give up freedoms anyways in order to please people or not anger them.
In the modern world, it's impossible to not give up freedoms, both willingly and unwillingly.
(also "freedoms" don't even really exist in wartimes or other like periods)

Behold the glorious mess that is the Iowa caucuses

LittleMissNyan wrote: ↑February 4th, 2020, 8:29 am Behold the glorious mess that is the Iowa caucuses

Facts. I just wanna see who won... On that note don't forget to register to vote if you can.

who watched the state of the union tell me your thoughts about it

imaditi wrote: ↑February 5th, 2020, 6:03 pm who watched the state of the union tell me your thoughts about it

Nancy Pelosi, what a woman.

hmma wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 9:09 am

imaditi wrote: ↑February 5th, 2020, 6:03 pm who watched the state of the union tell me your thoughts about it

Nancy Pelosi, what a woman.

I mean it definitely wasn't the best course of action,
but given the circumstances, I can understand why she did it
(still not a justification)

JoeyC wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 4:48 pm

hmma wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 9:09 am

imaditi wrote: ↑February 5th, 2020, 6:03 pm who watched the state of the union tell me your thoughts about it

Nancy Pelosi, what a woman.

I mean it definitely wasn't the best course of action,
but given the circumstances, I can understand why she did it
(still not a justification)

I thought it was hilarious.

PM2017 wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 5:08 pm

JoeyC wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 4:48 pm

hmma wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 9:09 am

Nancy Pelosi, what a woman.

I mean it definitely wasn't the best course of action,
but given the circumstances, I can understand why she did it
(still not a justification)

I thought it was hilarious.

I found the muttering to herself throughout the speech quite funny as well...

PM2017 wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 5:08 pm

JoeyC wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 4:48 pm

hmma wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 9:09 am

Nancy Pelosi, what a woman.

I mean it definitely wasn't the best course of action,
but given the circumstances, I can understand why she did it
(still not a justification)

I thought it was hilarious.

Which is ultimately the important part of the SOTU - to put on a show for the masses. If it was actually meant to provide information there would be no need for a speech - it would be delivered in writing, as was done for the first half of US history.

Unome wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 6:02 pm

PM2017 wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 5:08 pm

JoeyC wrote: ↑February 6th, 2020, 4:48 pm

I mean it definitely wasn't the best course of action,
but given the circumstances, I can understand why she did it
(still not a justification)

I thought it was hilarious.

Which is ultimately the important part of the SOTU - to put on a show for the masses. If it was actually meant to provide information there would be no need for a speech - it would be delivered in writing, as was done for the first half of US history.

Trump declined both her and mike pence a handshake and she didn't address him properly. "He shredded the truth, so I shredded the speech"