Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Posted: April 28th, 2018, 5:55 pm
With such low temperatures (and significantly higher volumes) it cools very little, so there is little room for variation. Our temperatures generally drop only 1-5 degrees between our initial measurement and 20-40 minutes of cooling. It's hard to be off by much with numbers like that.5uper5tring wrote:Thank you for the information! Still curious -- why is your prediction less accurate without ice water?Alex-RCHS wrote:I don’t know what the highest experimental score was, but for the teams that did not use ice the highest possible score is 40.5uper5tring wrote:
Was the 39.88 the highest experimental score (prediction + heat retention + ice bonus) achieved in that event? If you had not added the ice, assuming your prediction was also within 0.5 deg without the ice, what do you think you score would have been?
Based on my trials we would have gotten about 0.5-1.5 points lower without the ice bonus at this time, temp, and volume (I can’t be sure without knowing he best HRF, but I know it was beneficial). That’s just based on the ice and heat scores. I think our prediction would be made much less accurate without the ice water.