Are you referring to off-topic banter? If so, apologiesOpticsNerd wrote: ↑February 25th, 2020, 5:20 am sigh...
Why is it always the Wright Stuff forum that gets heavily spammed?

Are you referring to off-topic banter? If so, apologiesOpticsNerd wrote: ↑February 25th, 2020, 5:20 am sigh...
Why is it always the Wright Stuff forum that gets heavily spammed?
He's talking about the 20 Russian threads that popped up this morning.lechassin wrote: ↑February 25th, 2020, 6:06 amAre you referring to off-topic banter? If so, apologiesOpticsNerd wrote: ↑February 25th, 2020, 5:20 am sigh...
Why is it always the Wright Stuff forum that gets heavily spammed?![]()
With or without rubber? It will also depend on tail moment. With rubber, ours is around 60% I believe, and 5mm decalage.lechassin wrote: ↑February 25th, 2020, 6:34 am Oh, OK.
On-topic: I'm seeing references here and there to CGs some distance behind the center of the wing, so >50% chord from the leading edge. Is this working for people,, and if so, how??? If we try to go anything much past 24mm (30%) we have to reduce decalage to zero and the plane drags its a$$ around really low. If we were to go even further back we would need negative decalage, to hold the tail up. In any of those cases the plane is grossly unstable.
What's the consensus?![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests