Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Area to advertise for your competitions!
User avatar
Tailsfan101
Member
Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 4:33 pm
Division: C
State: ID
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by Tailsfan101 »

Tentative results from the live spreadsheet:

1. Troy High School (135)
2. Seven Lakes High School (161)
3. West Windsor-Plainsboro High School North (241)
4. Boca Raton Community High School (268)
5. William G. Enloe High School (275)
6. Liberal Arts and Science Academy (320)
7. West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South (322)
8. Mason High School (328)
9. New Trier High School (342)
10. William P. Clements High School (360)
"Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you." Matthew 5:11-12

I have no regrets.
MacintoshJosh
Member
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:50 pm
Division: C
State: VA
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by MacintoshJosh »

Seven Lakes looking strong! Wonder if they can take down Troy this year.
Lake Braddock Secondary School
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by PM2017 »

MacintoshJosh wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2020 6:02 pm Seven Lakes looking strong! Wonder if they can take down Troy this year.
That was insanely strong. In my memory, this is the closest a team has been to Troy since 2016 (and even then, iirc I think some unforeseen issues happened to Troy at nats, dropping them to 4th)
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
CrayolaCrayon
Member
Member
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:24 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by CrayolaCrayon »

MIT '25
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
User avatar
sciolyperson1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 528 times
Been thanked: 597 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by sciolyperson1 »

BirdSO Tournament Director, SoCal Planning Team
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4315
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by Unome »

poonicle wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:10 pm GUYS MY GEOMAPPING IDOL WAS THE ES!!!!! everyone from my school was fangirling/fanboying over him
hi

Regarding Troy/7L, there was a similar situation in 2017 at MIT. That was also the year 7L didn't qualify for Nationals.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
Name
Member
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:41 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by Name »

not gonna get tests back for like another month or so, ig i'll just post reviews/thoughts now?

Astro (10): The multiple choice section was very easy (which is prob a good thing to separate teams), as the short response varied from semi impossible to impossible to what did this question even just say? But considering this is MIT and the test writers, that's what was expected. And as a bonus they even did some js9 questions! I think I would've liked a few "intermediate" questions instead of really easy or really hard questions. Also for the ID this DSO it probably would've been better to just give letter of picture instead of making that also mult choice. This should be an interesting test to figure out whenever I get the key. (10/10)

Code (1): !!! I think we full scored the test (assuming we didn't lose points to errors) and around a 3 min time bonus. The test def could've been longer- we were not the only team to finish completely, thus making placements due to time bonus. And the time bonus was super wack, the "red wheelbarrow" poem or something (def not a standard timed). We struggled a bit getting a start on it, but it appears everyone else did as well. The second main problem is the first morbit. They did give you 6 letter mappings but as a sound recording in morse, which I did not comprehend (very creative but is that legal to test?). In the end it didn't matter though, the morbit was surprisingly solveable w/o any hint digits. I will say it was a surreal experience taking this test. (8/10)

Fossils (9): !!! I honestly expected to bomb like usual, but didn't. The test wasn't as hard as I would've expect from MIT. Some stations were actually very easy when I could answer everything with confidence way before time was up, and others was more like ??? The multiple choice packet was really fun actually with the time given just enough for us to finish. The room was also set up really nicely to help us move around quickly and without confusion. (10/10)

Overall (12 :o ): I kinda wish there was more time to explore the campus or meetup with people or whatever but we basically just left immediately after last session ended. But an opportunity to come back here and compete for the third time was pretty awesome. All of my events were on time and ran quite smoothly, and the quality and difficulty of the tests are unparalleled. (10/10)

I'm still shocked at how well we did. NY states should be very competitive this year.
South Woods MS, Syosset HS '21
BirdSO TD/ES
Past Events: Microbe, Invasive, Matsci, Fermi, Astro, Code, Fossils
1st place MIT Codebusters 2019-2020
1st place NYS Fermi Questions (2019), Astronomy and Codebusters (2021)
Science Olympiad Founder's Scholarship winner
IvySpear
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:38 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by IvySpear »

Y'all SLEEPING on Enloe.

By the way, congrats to Syosset for first in Code. 3 minutes on that timed question is really impressive indeed. Funny how Duke was more competitive code-wise than MIT though.
Self-actualization is an irony, for when you achieve it, you realize you have not achieved it.
User avatar
LiteralRhinoceros
Member
Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:08 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by LiteralRhinoceros »

Picture This (1): terms were kinda basic, would've loved to have seen a list more like last year. my lack of bio knowledge got exposed here tho

Dynamic (3): nice test. it wasn't a super long test, but was still a time crunch. it tested the concepts well, and all in all was run well.

Geomapping (13): why was this event held in a lecture hall? Considering there was actual mapping and etc to so on the test, having such a small area to work in was really hindering. As for the test, I did enjoy the emphasis on mapping. Unome's geomapping tests always do that, but there was also a lack of conceptual testing. There was 1 section out of 5+ dealing with conceptual earth science, while the event sheet mandates more weight to that. One last thing. What was with not being able to separate the test or image sheets? Dealing with the problems with the test taking environment was probably harder than the test.

Astronomy (20): we didn't expect anything from this event except a crazy hard test, and it delivered. The use of js9 was exceptional, and the rest of the test really made me think, instead of Wikipedia bashing.

LMMM (13): originally builderguy135 and sciolyperson1 were gonna do this, but WS was running late, so I did the picture this test then went over to the room. The test was really well done. The stations were a good length, and the memes tested weren't easy. Hope to see this at nats next year.

Overall (3): this invy was a really fun experience. the water bottles were the highlight though. The test quality was great, and the logistics of the invy had no hiccups.

edit: formatting
Last edited by LiteralRhinoceros on Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
Dank Memes Area Homeschool 2017-2019

Community MS '19
WW-P HS North '23

Events: DyPlan, GeoMapping, Astro

Userpage
DontWorryAboutIt
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 10:10 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Science Olympiad at MIT Invitational 2020

Post by DontWorryAboutIt »

LiteralRhinoceros wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:53 am Geomapping (13): why was this event held in a lecture hall? Considering there was actual mapping and etc to so on the test, having such a small area to work in was really hindering. As for the test, I did enjoy the emphasis on mapping. Unome's geomapping tests always do that, but there was also a lack of conceptual testing. There was 1 section out of 5+ dealing with conceptual earth science, while the event sheet mandates more weight to that. One last thing. What was with not being able to separate the test or image sheets? Dealing with the problems with the test taking environment was probably harder than the test.
Wait, so the supervisor is Unome?
Last edited by pikachu4919 on Sun Jan 26, 2020 8:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Removed namedrop
Solon '20

Return to “2020 Invitationals”