Machines B/C

Locked
Giventhenumbers
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: April 12th, 2019, 8:01 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Machines B/C

Post by Giventhenumbers »

Also, important question: will the weights given during competition be adjustable (I.e., on strings to hook on to the device) or would those have to be separately impounded?
Herpetology is my specialty, 20+ medals. :geek:

GO SCIENCE AND ARTS ACADEMY!! (And everyone else)
User avatar
waterboy
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: March 8th, 2019, 12:47 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by waterboy »

xiangyu wrote: November 18th, 2019, 7:31 pm
waterboy wrote: November 18th, 2019, 5:32 pm Is anyone else confused about creating a graph to use on your device?
I think it depends on your device. For example, I know some devices might have things set up so that at different ratios the levers might go to different angles (Not necessarily exact equilibrium, and mostly only applicable for C). This is what my first machine encounter, building a second one right now to try to get rid of that problem. If your device is built perfect spot on then yeah probably less likely you'll need to use the graph.

Xiangyu
How would you use the graph for the B device, which is a class 1 lever
Circuit Lab, Density Lab, Machines, Mission Possible :geek: :geek:
User avatar
xiangyu
Member
Member
Posts: 276
Joined: April 6th, 2019, 8:32 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by xiangyu »

waterboy wrote: November 19th, 2019, 5:33 am
xiangyu wrote: November 18th, 2019, 7:31 pm
waterboy wrote: November 18th, 2019, 5:32 pm Is anyone else confused about creating a graph to use on your device?
I think it depends on your device. For example, I know some devices might have things set up so that at different ratios the levers might go to different angles (Not necessarily exact equilibrium, and mostly only applicable for C). This is what my first machine encounter, building a second one right now to try to get rid of that problem. If your device is built perfect spot on then yeah probably less likely you'll need to use the graph.

Xiangyu
How would you use the graph for the B device, which is a class 1 lever
I think the main idea is that the graphs show your process of device calibration. Your lever may not be equal at the start as one side is just slightly heavier than the other and the tables show the scientific process you took to add clay/sand off and tune the machine to make it better.

Xiangyu
Medal & Ribbon Count: 33
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
User avatar
xiangyu
Member
Member
Posts: 276
Joined: April 6th, 2019, 8:32 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by xiangyu »

Giventhenumbers wrote: November 18th, 2019, 8:07 pm Question: I’m new at this event, and currently am working on figuring out how I would calculate mass ratios in the build portion of the event. I know it has to do with the law of levers, but what exactly would I do?
Im in división C, and am currently assembling the complex lever. I just need to figure out how I would calculate mass ratios. To fill in the blanks for distances, I’ll say 5 cm on one side of the class 2 lever, and 15 on the other.
See the previous video link I posted, it should be a nice intro to the event. To summarize it real quick for you, basically you do "distance from fulcrum"/total "movable" lever length to get position ratio of one mass. Repeat this process for the other lever. Compare the two decimals, do A ratio/B ratio and you should get your answer. Of course, you do all these calculations after moving masses around and reaching equilibrium of levers.

I need to know more clearly what you mean by 5 cm and 15 cm, are they distances from the fulcurm? What's your lever length? etc.

Also disclaimer: my method might not be the best, and I would love to hear if others have an easier way.

Xiangyu
Medal & Ribbon Count: 33
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
Vortexx2
Member
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: September 2nd, 2019, 8:17 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by Vortexx2 »

The rules say we need 4 graphs/data tables. If I have 4 data tables of 10 data points each, is this sufficient?
8th grade events: Mission Possible and Hovercraft.
High School: Codebusters, Designer genes, Gravity Vehicle, Mission Possible, Machines, Ping Pong Parachute, Boomilever, Protein Modeling.

It's been a heck of a ride, vortexx out.
User avatar
waterboy
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: March 8th, 2019, 12:47 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by waterboy »

Vortexx2 wrote: November 22nd, 2019, 9:44 am The rules say we need 4 graphs/data tables. If I have 4 data tables of 10 data points each, is this sufficient?
I think this would be sufficient as long as it meets the other requirements in 5.e.
Circuit Lab, Density Lab, Machines, Mission Possible :geek: :geek:
PandaShoelaces
Member
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: October 25th, 2019, 8:35 am
Division: C
State: IA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Machines B/C

Post by PandaShoelaces »

Part of the rules says this in section e of Event Parameters:
Event Supervisors will supply three masses labeled A, B, and C. A flexible loop, large enough to pass a standard golf ball through, must be tied to the top of each mass. The loops may be made from fishing line, zip ties, string, etc. The masses, including the fully stretched outflexible loop, must be able to fit inside a 15.0 cm x 15.0 cm x 20.0 cm box. Masses A, B, and C must be between 20.0 and 800.0 g.
These are simply directions to event supervisors, right? So, does this mean that the masses must be hung from the levers and not placed atop them?
Vortexx2
Member
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: September 2nd, 2019, 8:17 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Machines B/C

Post by Vortexx2 »

PandaShoelaces wrote: November 26th, 2019, 10:28 am Part of the rules says this in section e of Event Parameters:
Event Supervisors will supply three masses labeled A, B, and C. A flexible loop, large enough to pass a standard golf ball through, must be tied to the top of each mass. The loops may be made from fishing line, zip ties, string, etc. The masses, including the fully stretched outflexible loop, must be able to fit inside a 15.0 cm x 15.0 cm x 20.0 cm box. Masses A, B, and C must be between 20.0 and 800.0 g.
These are simply directions to event supervisors, right? So, does this mean that the masses must be hung from the levers and not placed atop them?
Based off this section of the rules, I would say that the masses could be hung from the lever OR placed on top of them.
8th grade events: Mission Possible and Hovercraft.
High School: Codebusters, Designer genes, Gravity Vehicle, Mission Possible, Machines, Ping Pong Parachute, Boomilever, Protein Modeling.

It's been a heck of a ride, vortexx out.
InsertNameHere123
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: November 28th, 2019, 9:37 pm
Division: B
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Do they weigh the hook?

Post by InsertNameHere123 »

Hey, so when the examiners weigh the masses before hand, does anyone know if they include the weight of the hook in their calculations for ratio? It's especially skewing in instances where the objects are really light, and I'm just worried that we're going to get skewed if the hook for the practical isn't included. Thanks in advance!
User avatar
waterboy
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: March 8th, 2019, 12:47 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Do they weigh the hook?

Post by waterboy »

InsertNameHere123 wrote: November 28th, 2019, 9:51 pm Hey, so when the examiners weigh the masses before hand, does anyone know if they include the weight of the hook in their calculations for ratio? It's especially skewing in instances where the objects are really light, and I'm just worried that we're going to get skewed if the hook for the practical isn't included. Thanks in advance!
Because you are trying to find the ratio of two masses and not the actual masses of the two objects, I don't think the weight of the hook matters as long as they are the same for each of the weights.
Circuit Lab, Density Lab, Machines, Mission Possible :geek: :geek:
Locked

Return to “Machines B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests