Scioly.org

they haven't come up with 1 yet

kp9ssa wrote:they haven't come up with 1 yet

come up with one what?

they probably wont come up with a real fossil list until early september

yeah...i think there was a draft one...ugh my memory fails me. i forget when this years came out.

It came out around August. And its not gonna change much, the fossil list also stays generally the same.

yeah...though they do tweak it a little sometimes...they had quite a few spelling mistakes on this year's one (Chrondrichthyes instead of Chondrichthyese completely threw me off)

im almost sure that they will keep the same3 field guide so they wont change the list much

i dont really care if they change the recommended field guide...my field guide is pure awesomeness

I thought with some extra pages the field guide the recommend was good.

soobsession wrote:yeah...though they do tweak it a little sometimes...they had quite a few spelling mistakes on this year's one (Chrondrichthyes instead of Chondrichthyese completely threw me off)

Chondrichthyese is also incorrect, just so people know not to make that mistake.
They said "Chrondrichthyes" it is "Chondricthyes", they added an r.

Also, in general, from year to year, or even from generation to generation (generation being used to describe the 2-3 year rotation periods), identification events tend not to change much, if at all. The new list will almost certainly be either identical, or nearly identical, to this years list.