Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

eladrinwizard1
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by eladrinwizard1 »

How big are the masses going to be? Also, how big are the loops?

Im a 1st year at SImleMachines
eladrinwizard1
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by eladrinwizard1 »

Sorry, i meant to say Simple Machines.

For the ratio part, i was wondering if i should balance the weights on top, make a hole through it and tie a string on, or use another method to find the ratios.
eladrinwizard1
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by eladrinwizard1 »

Clarification: This is for Division B. We have an invitational next Saturday, so fast help would be appreciated.
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by Unome »

eladrinwizard1 wrote:Sorry, i meant to say Simple Machines.

For the ratio part, i was wondering if i should balance the weights on top, make a hole through it and tie a string on, or use another method to find the ratios.
eladrinwizard1 wrote:How big are the masses going to be? Also, how big are the loops?

Im a 1st year at SImleMachines
All of these can be answered by rereading the rules. The masses have a maximum size (I think 15x15x20 cm). I don't think the loops have a specific maximum size, however they have to be larger than some specified amount (I can't remember, it's in the rules). Most likely, the best method for finding the ratios is to hang them with the loops.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
chinesesushi
Member
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chinesesushi »

Has anyone built their machine for Division C yet? If so, does it work :D
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
User avatar
blindmewithscience
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 8:57 pm
Division: C
State: NV
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by blindmewithscience »

chinesesushi wrote:Has anyone built their machine for Division C yet? If so, does it work :D
My team's nearly done with ours. Hopefully it'll work :D.
We took some wood blocks to create stands for two metersticks. The metersticks are the fulcrums, and we drilled holes through them and inserted a screw for a fulcrum. The two metersticks are attached with a screw, with some room for movement. Hopefully that's not too terribly unclear :P
Have you built yours yet?
Nevada state SO occurs on tau/2 day. Support the correct mathematical constant with all tauists.
http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto

Event: Regional/States
Astronomy: x/:(
Bungee: 3/3
Compound Machines: x/1
TPS: x/:(
User avatar
chinesesushi
Member
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chinesesushi »

blindmewithscience wrote:
chinesesushi wrote:Has anyone built their machine for Division C yet? If so, does it work :D
My team's nearly done with ours. Hopefully it'll work :D.
We took some wood blocks to create stands for two metersticks. The metersticks are the fulcrums, and we drilled holes through them and inserted a screw for a fulcrum. The two metersticks are attached with a screw, with some room for movement. Hopefully that's not too terribly unclear :P
Have you built yours yet?
that should work. i have not, but i should get on that as i have an invitational in like a month XD
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
joeyjoejoe
Member
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:56 pm
Division: C
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by joeyjoejoe »

chinesesushi wrote:Has anyone built their machine for Division C yet? If so, does it work :D
We had our first meeting on this yesterday and had hoped to be buying materials today but we are still working on the math. If we leave all fulcrums alone and only adjust the positions of the weight, it seems that no matter where we fix our fulcrums, a scenario exists that is either impossible to measure or not optimal (1cm from fulcrum for ex.)- especially with the 10:1 max ratio for nationals.

We figured that the event creators probably designed the event this way and that we would meet next week to brain storm once again.
That's our approach at least: brainstorm:build is roughly 5:1
User avatar
blindmewithscience
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 8:57 pm
Division: C
State: NV
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by blindmewithscience »

joeyjoejoe wrote:
chinesesushi wrote:Has anyone built their machine for Division C yet? If so, does it work :D
We had our first meeting on this yesterday and had hoped to be buying materials today but we are still working on the math. If we leave all fulcrums alone and only adjust the positions of the weight, it seems that no matter where we fix our fulcrums, a scenario exists that is either impossible to measure or not optimal (1cm from fulcrum for ex.)- especially with the 10:1 max ratio for nationals.

We figured that the event creators probably designed the event this way and that we would meet next week to brain storm once again.
That's our approach at least: brainstorm:build is roughly 5:1
Hm, wait a minute. You can make it so that with the maximum ratio, you can get a distance of at least 4cm for the 10x weight. I can post something on calculations/stuff if you want, or let you figure it out for yourselves :D

EDIT: Or, by changing where you have the fulcrums are, you can achieve a much higher distance for the 10x mass.
Nevada state SO occurs on tau/2 day. Support the correct mathematical constant with all tauists.
http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto

Event: Regional/States
Astronomy: x/:(
Bungee: 3/3
Compound Machines: x/1
TPS: x/:(
joeyjoejoe
Member
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:56 pm
Division: C
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by joeyjoejoe »

Yep, 4cm, not one like I said above.
If the fulcrum of the class 1 lever is in the middle and mass m1 was placed at the extreme end of it, then m2=10*m1 would balance the structure if placed 4cm from the fulcrum of the class two lever. If m2=8*m1 (a pretty big difference!) then it would balance at 5 cm - a measly one cm difference! Factor in friction and the possibility of a sloppy build and you've got yourself a mess!

...and your suggestion was exactly what we were looking at. If we move the fulcrum of the 1st class lever to the right so that it is 30cm from the left and 10cm from the right of the ends, the difference between 8x and 10x is equally multiplied so that the structure would balance at 15cm and 12cm respectively.
This seemed better but it has a major flaw! I wont tell what it is though. Just throw some examples into the equations and remember: we have no way of knowing exactly how much the masses weigh and many will have trouble determining which mass is heaviest - especially when they are very close.

Return to “2015 Lab Events”