Forensics C

User avatar
Phenylethylamine
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:47 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by Phenylethylamine »

NinjaChicken wrote:How about soil analysis? Anyone have a site I can go to for that?
In my experience, soil analysis has been mostly common sense: this suspect is a beach lifeguard, and very sandy soil was found at the crime scene, so that implicates him. Potting soil was found at the crime scene, and this one works in a greenhouse. Things like that.

On some events, they might conceivably ask you questions about soil classification itself; I'd put a soil texture triangle in your notes if you have room. But really, I don't think I've ever seen soil used on any event in more than a simple common-sense way.
Protein Modeling Event Supervisor 2015
MA State Science Olympiad Tournament
MIT Invitational Tournament
--
Ward Melville High School Science Olympiad 2010-2012
Paul J Gelinas JHS Science Olympiad 2007-2009
User avatar
NinjaChicken
Member
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:08 am
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by NinjaChicken »

Phenylethylamine wrote:In my experience, soil analysis has been mostly common sense: this suspect is a beach lifeguard, and very sandy soil was found at the crime scene, so that implicates him. Potting soil was found at the crime scene, and this one works in a greenhouse. Things like that.

On some events, they might conceivably ask you questions about soil classification itself; I'd put a soil texture triangle in your notes if you have room. But really, I don't think I've ever seen soil used on any event in more than a simple common-sense way.
Thanks, that image is perfect. I have plenty of space on my notes, and that was basically the only part in our last invite that I didn't really know that was on the test.
Image Image
User avatar
Dragonshark
Member
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: WI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by Dragonshark »

I haven't had much hands-on experience with this event, and Regionals is in a few days >_<. My partner is going to do qualitative analysis, while I do polymers/fibers, some of the crime scene evidence, and the essay. Is it generally a good idea that we start the chromatogram early in the test and write a portion of the essay as soon as we're finished analyzing a piece of evidence?

Edit: (apologize for all of these questions) How can you tell the difference between sodium bicarbonate and carbonate? (as in, what test should you perform?)
Edit 2: Actually, forget about the above edit. Figured it out.
Nathan Hale HS SciO
2011 - Regionals/States: Anat/Phys [1/1!!!], Chem Lab [1/2]
2012 - Regionals/States: Chem Lab [1/6 >_< ], Forensics [2/1!!!], Protein [1/2], Team [9]
2013 - A/P, Chem Lab, 4N6, TPS, C/A (trial)
salcedam
Member
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 6:40 pm
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by salcedam »

Dragonshark wrote:I haven't had much hands-on experience with this event, and Regionals is in a few days >_<. My partner is going to do qualitative analysis, while I do polymers/fibers, some of the crime scene evidence, and the essay. Is it generally a good idea that we start the chromatogram early in the test and write a portion of the essay as soon as we're finished analyzing a piece of evidence?

Edit: (apologize for all of these questions) How can you tell the difference between sodium bicarbonate and carbonate? (as in, what test should you perform?)
Edit 2: Actually, forget about the above edit. Figured it out.
You should definitely start doing chromatography right away so the eluent has time to move the ink molecules up far enough that you can get a good reading on Rf values and such. In terms of the essay, it depends on how fast and how thorough you can be. The way I do essays is, as I mentioned in some post in here before, I write down the names of EVERYONE and next to each person, I write down the things that matched. That gives me a good portion of the points. Then afterwards, if there's time, I write an analysis/conclusion to the essay that states who the suspect is and why. But you should, at the bare minimum, have written everything down that matches each person because the proctor will give you points on the fact that you wrote things down.
2011 - 2012 Season Results:
Whiting, IN - Astro (1st), 4N6 (2nd), Fermi (2nd)
Boyceville, WI - Astro (3rd), 4N6 (1st)
Belvidere, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (2nd)
WSU, OH - 4N6 (12th)
Loyola, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st), TPS (3rd)
OCC Regional - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st)
UCF Nationals - 4N6 (8th)
User avatar
Dragonshark
Member
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: WI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by Dragonshark »

salcedam wrote:
Dragonshark wrote:I haven't had much hands-on experience with this event, and Regionals is in a few days >_<. My partner is going to do qualitative analysis, while I do polymers/fibers, some of the crime scene evidence, and the essay. Is it generally a good idea that we start the chromatogram early in the test and write a portion of the essay as soon as we're finished analyzing a piece of evidence?

Edit: (apologize for all of these questions) How can you tell the difference between sodium bicarbonate and carbonate? (as in, what test should you perform?)
Edit 2: Actually, forget about the above edit. Figured it out.
You should definitely start doing chromatography right away so the eluent has time to move the ink molecules up far enough that you can get a good reading on Rf values and such. In terms of the essay, it depends on how fast and how thorough you can be. The way I do essays is, as I mentioned in some post in here before, I write down the names of EVERYONE and next to each person, I write down the things that matched. That gives me a good portion of the points. Then afterwards, if there's time, I write an analysis/conclusion to the essay that states who the suspect is and why. But you should, at the bare minimum, have written everything down that matches each person because the proctor will give you points on the fact that you wrote things down.
OK, thanks. In general, how long should I keep the chromatogram going?
Nathan Hale HS SciO
2011 - Regionals/States: Anat/Phys [1/1!!!], Chem Lab [1/2]
2012 - Regionals/States: Chem Lab [1/6 >_< ], Forensics [2/1!!!], Protein [1/2], Team [9]
2013 - A/P, Chem Lab, 4N6, TPS, C/A (trial)
salcedam
Member
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 6:40 pm
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by salcedam »

Dragonshark wrote:
salcedam wrote:
Dragonshark wrote:I haven't had much hands-on experience with this event, and Regionals is in a few days >_<. My partner is going to do qualitative analysis, while I do polymers/fibers, some of the crime scene evidence, and the essay. Is it generally a good idea that we start the chromatogram early in the test and write a portion of the essay as soon as we're finished analyzing a piece of evidence?

Edit: (apologize for all of these questions) How can you tell the difference between sodium bicarbonate and carbonate? (as in, what test should you perform?)
Edit 2: Actually, forget about the above edit. Figured it out.
You should definitely start doing chromatography right away so the eluent has time to move the ink molecules up far enough that you can get a good reading on Rf values and such. In terms of the essay, it depends on how fast and how thorough you can be. The way I do essays is, as I mentioned in some post in here before, I write down the names of EVERYONE and next to each person, I write down the things that matched. That gives me a good portion of the points. Then afterwards, if there's time, I write an analysis/conclusion to the essay that states who the suspect is and why. But you should, at the bare minimum, have written everything down that matches each person because the proctor will give you points on the fact that you wrote things down.
OK, thanks. In general, how long should I keep the chromatogram going?
You should keep the chromatogram going for about 10 - 15 minutes max. You don't want to it run too long or else the water and ink may travel too far up and hit the top of the paper or whatever is suspending the paper over the solution. Use your best judgement as to when to stop. You shouldn't stop it if there's still a lot of ink particles bunched up at the top. Keep it running until you think you've got a nice spread of colors in the ink and you think that there aren't any more particles that need to be separated.
2011 - 2012 Season Results:
Whiting, IN - Astro (1st), 4N6 (2nd), Fermi (2nd)
Boyceville, WI - Astro (3rd), 4N6 (1st)
Belvidere, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (2nd)
WSU, OH - 4N6 (12th)
Loyola, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st), TPS (3rd)
OCC Regional - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st)
UCF Nationals - 4N6 (8th)
User avatar
Dragonshark
Member
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: WI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by Dragonshark »

65/100 with 2nd place at regionals. Really need to practice more with this event for state. My partner, despite having 2 years of experience with this event, still got most of the qualitative analysis wrong, probably because we didn't do much practice. I guess I did OK. For hairs and fibers, the proctor gave us some electron micrographs of them. Since some fibers have very distinguishing features (ex. wool), I didn't even need to do any flame tests for them, and just wrote the flame test results from the stuff on my notes. We weren't asked to ID any plastics. The crime scene evidence was only blood typing and fingerprints, which were pretty easy.

The proctor was also nice enough to give us extra time for the essay. I think I got a 24/30 on it even though I had a good logic path, probably because I incorrectly identified some of the evidence, which means the wrong suspects were implicated.

Also, another question: How can you differentiate dog from horse hair? (I got that part wrong on the test.)
Nathan Hale HS SciO
2011 - Regionals/States: Anat/Phys [1/1!!!], Chem Lab [1/2]
2012 - Regionals/States: Chem Lab [1/6 >_< ], Forensics [2/1!!!], Protein [1/2], Team [9]
2013 - A/P, Chem Lab, 4N6, TPS, C/A (trial)
salcedam
Member
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 6:40 pm
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by salcedam »

Dragonshark wrote:65/100 with 2nd place at regionals. Really need to practice more with this event for state. My partner, despite having 2 years of experience with this event, still got most of the qualitative analysis wrong, probably because we didn't do much practice. I guess I did OK. For hairs and fibers, the proctor gave us some electron micrographs of them. Since some fibers have very distinguishing features (ex. wool), I didn't even need to do any flame tests for them, and just wrote the flame test results from the stuff on my notes. We weren't asked to ID any plastics. The crime scene evidence was only blood typing and fingerprints, which were pretty easy.

The proctor was also nice enough to give us extra time for the essay. I think I got a 24/30 on it even though I had a good logic path, probably because I incorrectly identified some of the evidence, which means the wrong suspects were implicated.

Also, another question: How can you differentiate dog from horse hair? (I got that part wrong on the test.)
Well, good job on your second place! Yeah, Forensics seems like an easy enough event and it really is now that you're allowed to type up your notes and such. When I first started three years ago, I had to make my sheet handwritten and I got such big hand cramps from writing so tiny to fit everything. But despite the easier requirements for notes, it does still take a lot of practice to be able to ID powders and fibers and other things in the qualitative analysis because you need to be able to do them quickly. There are a lot of components as you've seen. :D

Not quite sure about that one. I just have a picture of both on my sheet and if I get a question like that, I just compare the hairs to the pictures. Sorry. >_<
2011 - 2012 Season Results:
Whiting, IN - Astro (1st), 4N6 (2nd), Fermi (2nd)
Boyceville, WI - Astro (3rd), 4N6 (1st)
Belvidere, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (2nd)
WSU, OH - 4N6 (12th)
Loyola, IL - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st), TPS (3rd)
OCC Regional - 4N6 (1st), Fermi (1st)
UCF Nationals - 4N6 (8th)
cpeters24
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:04 am
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Forensics C

Post by cpeters24 »

Hey! I have an invitational this Saturday, and my partner and I were double checking the rules. We did not know anything about the cobalt blue glass under flame test equipment that teams are supposed to bring. We have some, but we do not know what it's used for. Can someone help me out with this?
AlphaTauri
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:41 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Forensics C

Post by AlphaTauri »

It's so you can filter out "color contamination" from sodium, which might obscure the true color of the flame. And sodium is everywhere - tap water, sweat from your hands, the team before you who accidentally dropped some powder into the Bunsen burner... Basically, cobalt blue will cancel out the bright orange flame of sodium and let you see if there's another color to the flame.
Hershey Science Olympiad 2009 - 2014
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018

]\/[ Go Blue!

Return to “2012 Lab Events”