Page 7 of 8
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 27th, 2010, 2:23 pm
by RandomPerson
fmtiger124 wrote:Protects self because eagle hill tied for eleventh atthe most recent nats
I protect myself for the same reason (Eagle Hill is a school in our district, which was one of the division b schools to have a 3 way tie at 11th).
(sorry sassy, I blame lots of apush work)
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
by Assassinator
Code: Select all
Here is the next clue:
Did you know Tiffany was in a movie? It debuted in 2010. This is much the same: Horrible
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 28th, 2010, 4:23 pm
by quizbowl
not sure how i protected myself correctly there

looking at 2010 in film, the only movie to have tiffany as a main actress was Double Negative
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Neg ... 2010_film)
I protect Paradox21, cause its a paradox.
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 28th, 2010, 6:34 pm
by brobo
Please forgive me.
On a not so random hunch, I accuse IdahoSciGuy of being the assassinator. This is not a guess, but more of a proven fact. I have known about it for a while, and in fact it was trajectoryrox's loose lips that let the cat out of the bag. In a game of Guess the Assassinator, the rule was that the host WOULD lie on the correct guess. After a 4 wrong guesses, I asked about IdahoSciGuy, to which traj told me it was someone NEW. Why would this be revealed to me? Only if it was a lie, and it would only be a lie if I guessed right.
Before anyone says anything, one of the terms of me accusing him was that I would do so on his terms. He asked me to accuse, and, as he puts it, "end his pain"
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 29th, 2010, 10:25 am
by IdahoSciGuy
Yes, I can confirm everything brobo said. Traj. did in fact give away my identity right after I published the first clue, and I just have not been able to make good clues knowing my identity is out there. So, heres the explanations.
The rules at the beginning of the game were a ploy. I liked starpug's idea so much, that i manipulated the rules to the point where most would think that the assassinator was a newbie/inexperienced. Needless to say, it worked exactly as planned. As i was on chat, it became immediately apparent that if i could pull this off, My real identity could stay on the down low for a while, and I could get a kill in.
Then Trajectory let it slip on chat, and suddenly the game got a lot less serious for me. I made up my clues in a matter of minutes, often when responding to a correct protect.
Clue 1 was just what you guys thought: Whatever name was not there, that was the victim.
Clue 2 was also a really easy on, with the numbers pointing to the star Procyon, in Canis Minor.
Clue 3 is pretty self explanitory. Putting those two pictures together gets my favorite video game character EVAR. Frogzorz was my target.
Clue 4 was one that i was proud of. You all thought it pointed to science olympiad regionals or invitationals, or even events. The reality is that it pointed to the NAQT National High School Tournament, a quizbowl tournament. Googling the schools together would reveal this.
Clue 5 Is a vague clue that i just came up with on a whim. Tiffany is pointing to the one-hit wonder artist of the 80s, and she was in a movie called Mega Piranha. The same production company that did that movie also released the movie "Sharktopus". Robodude was the intended target.
No for the final comment. In a way, i dont look on this game as being too horrible, and if anything this should provide a nice transition into new games using Starpug's idea. I really think starpug's mob rule idea is a new age for these games, and because of this, I am letting Starpug pick the next assassinator that will implement the new rules. Starpug, PM me when you can.
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 29th, 2010, 11:20 am
by brobo
I can confirm that I wish starpug to pick the next assassinator. He will colaborate with him/her to impliment the Mob idea.
Because of this, I will in fact be eligible to play, since I have no hand in picking the next assassinator.
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 29th, 2010, 5:05 pm
by paleonaps
IdahoSciGuy wrote:
No for the final comment. In a way, i dont look on this game as being too horrible, and if anything this should provide a nice transition into new games using Starpug's idea. I really think starpug's mob rule idea is a new age for these games, and because of this, I am letting Starpug pick the next assassinator that will implement the new rules. Starpug, PM me when you can.[/quote]
What is Starpug's idea?
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 29th, 2010, 8:52 pm
by RandomPerson
You broke the tradition Idaho >:|
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 29th, 2010, 11:28 pm
by IdahoSciGuy
Well, brobo is actually the one who told me he wanted Starpug to pick the assassinator for the next round. It wasn't my idea. And yeah, i know this was a bad round, you really don't need to tell me.
/walks off in shame.
Re: Scioly Assassination 62: Game Over
Posted: October 30th, 2010, 6:27 am
by brobo
IdahoSciGuy wrote:Well, brobo is actually the one who told me he wanted Starpug to pick the assassinator for the next round. It wasn't my idea. And yeah, i know this was a bad round, you really don't need to tell me.
/walks off in shame.
It was in no way a bad round on your part. I completely understand how the quality takes a free fall as soon as you know someone else knows. And you have had a good round in the past, so it's not like we haven't seen that you're a perfectly good Assassinator.