For morphological features I just put diagrams of the anatomy of everything. I would say pictures are more useful for ID but make sure you know what certain features are called (for brachiopods, fold and sulcus and which is on which valve is often tested). As for fossils as evidence for evolutionary trends, you mainly only need to worry about eusthenopteron/tiktaalik/acanthostega/eryops, archaeopteryx, and maybe mesohippus/equus, basilosaurus, or mammut/mammuthus. Just make sure you know what features in transition species are evidence for evolution and possible causes for their evolution. I would also suggest finding many diagrams of different features during the transition (e.g. the feet or teeth of horses over time, skulls or number of toes in the fish to amphibian transition, etc.) cause I’ve often seen tests asking you to match pictures of one of those features to one of the species in the transition (this mainly applies to fish to amphibian, but I’ve seen it with the horses as well).AkshayB wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 7:06 pm What did you guys research and put in your binder for adaptations and morphological features of major fossils groups. Did you guys put pictures of brachiopods, bivalves , and etc. or did you write a description. Also how in depth did you go for fossils as evidence for evolutionary trends and for major fossil discoveries? What did you write about that? Thank you in advance for anyone that responds!
Side note: you might also be tested on jaw, shark, and human evolution now that agnatha, otodus, and h.erectus and h.sapien have been added to the list.