Baculites is an ammonite, as well as an ammonoid with ammonitic sutures (not all ammonoids/ammonites have ammonitic sutures). Orthoceras is not a nautilus, it is a nautiloid with nautiloid sutures. I don't mean to be nit picky, but it is a very real difference, and if you confuse them you may not get credit on a test.gneissisnice wrote:Its fairly simple.
Baculites is an ammonite, while orthoceras is a nautilus.
This means that bacilutes will have very complex suture structures, kinda shaped like flowers (at least I think so). Orthoceras is different, its sutures are just straight lines.
Fossils
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Fossils
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Fossils
Sorry, youre right. I meant Nautiloid.inuyashakusho wrote:Baculites is an ammonite, as well as an ammonoid with ammonitic sutures (not all ammonoids/ammonites have ammonitic sutures). Orthoceras is not a nautilus, it is a nautiloid with nautiloid sutures. I don't mean to be nit picky, but it is a very real difference, and if you confuse them you may not get credit on a test.gneissisnice wrote:Its fairly simple.
Baculites is an ammonite, while orthoceras is a nautilus.
This means that bacilutes will have very complex suture structures, kinda shaped like flowers (at least I think so). Orthoceras is different, its sutures are just straight lines.
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
- Member
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:09 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils
As someone starting fossils next year, what do you think should be my first step? I've begun looking at the wiki (thanks a ton!) and taking notes. I'll probably get started on ID soon. What else is there?
-
- Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:14 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils
There's too many places to start... First step should be probably finding yourself a nice field guide. I personally prefer the Audobon because if you can ID everything easily and know the important stuff, the Audobon can be useful for finding additional information. Not to mention it also has pretty nice information on the time periods and fossil bearing rocks. Then when the new fossils list comes out, put sticky notes over everything you don't need to know so when you're flipping around, you won't be distracted by millions of other fossils. Then tab your handbook according to phylum, superclass/class/subclass.
Then you start working on your binder, with a page for each genus. Include a picture, taxonomic classification, mode of life, size, time range, food, movement and anything else you can think of that could be useful. Tab your binder too. After that, I would put together a table of contents based on taxonomic classification and the time range. And hopefully by that time, you'll have spent so much time working on each individual genus that without even meaning to ID the fossil, you learned to ID it anyways.
Then you start working on your binder, with a page for each genus. Include a picture, taxonomic classification, mode of life, size, time range, food, movement and anything else you can think of that could be useful. Tab your binder too. After that, I would put together a table of contents based on taxonomic classification and the time range. And hopefully by that time, you'll have spent so much time working on each individual genus that without even meaning to ID the fossil, you learned to ID it anyways.
Hi. I have a messed up sleep cycle. Thank you, scioly.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils
What I found was helpful in learning ID is actually drawing the specimen. I would break it up into phylums and draw the best sketch I can of each specimen, then to better separate the specimens I went back to the drawings and use a highlighter to mark distinguishing features. For example, pretend there's a phylum on the list with 3 different crabs (pretend with me please!). I would draw the best picture I can of each crab, then I would go back and highlight distinguishing features (i.e. large right claw, long legs, small eyes). Hope this helps!
SO stressed!
-
- Member
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:33 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils
i feel proudJonnyC wrote:As someone starting fossils next year, what do you think should be my first step? I've begun looking at the wiki (thanks a ton!) and taking notes. I'll probably get started on ID soon. What else is there?


ok...basically what i did was split up the fossils list with my partner. then we both got a copy of the audubon field guide (i personally prefer that one). then we made a binder. well...my partner didnt do much so i made his part of the binder too. making the binder basically let me memorize everything cuz i handwrote a lot of the info. i used the internet...and the audubon field guide. it worked pretty well in my opinion.

"Do or do not. There is no try" -Yoda


-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Fossils
Making a binder is the best way of studying.
That way, you know where all of your info is, plus you learn a lot while making the binder.
That way, you know where all of your info is, plus you learn a lot while making the binder.
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:47 am
- Division: B
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils
Fusulinids-
Class- Fusulinid
Family: Fusulinidae
I'm not sure but i think this is right.
Class- Fusulinid
Family: Fusulinidae
I'm not sure but i think this is right.
