Page 57 of 65
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 16th, 2009, 2:23 pm
				by soobsession
				blufoster6 wrote:That's a pretty good idea. I would have never thought of that.
thanks it was mentioned earlier in the forum so thank whoever said that. cuz i wouldnt have thought of doing it either if it werent for that post  

 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 17th, 2009, 6:17 pm
				by Sunshine
				Well, seeing as the handbooks have a whole bunch of information you don't need, you could take it apart and just put the information you need in your binder. What I did though was just put sticky notes over everything I don't need to know to prevent it from distracting me.
And also... Dimetrodon's listed under Theraspids on the fossil list... shouldn't it be a Pelycosaur?
			 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 18th, 2009, 7:15 am
				by soobsession
				Sunshine wrote:
And also... Dimetrodon's listed under Theraspids on the fossil list... shouldn't it be a Pelycosaur?
i might have misinterpreted your question but isnt a dimetrodon a pelycosaur?  

 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 18th, 2009, 5:19 pm
				by croman74
				soobsession wrote:Sunshine wrote:
And also... Dimetrodon's listed under Theraspids on the fossil list... shouldn't it be a Pelycosaur?
i might have misinterpreted your question but isnt a dimetrodon a pelycosaur?  

 
I 
think that's what she's asking.
 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 18th, 2009, 7:41 pm
				by Sunshine
				Yeah, that's what I'm asking. Dimetrodon should be a pelycosaur right? But it's listed as a theraspid on the Fossil list.
			 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 19th, 2009, 8:53 am
				by soobsession
				gah...i 
think this is what your asking
dimetrodons are pelycosaurs and pelycosaurs are theraspids....right?  

 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 19th, 2009, 12:01 pm
				by Sunshine
				Okay, for some reason... I think I just got confused about what I'm asking myself 

 Sorry about wording it in a way that's hard to understand.
But nevermind, I think I understand it a bit better, thanks though. 

 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 19th, 2009, 1:18 pm
				by sciencegeek100
				blufoster6 wrote:If you have a book, the easiest way to find things quick is to put tabs where the major phylla start. It helped out soooo much!!
LOL... i have like 40 tabs in my 4 or 5 inch binder....
 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 19th, 2009, 1:37 pm
				by monkeysareawesome
				soobsession wrote:gah...i 
think this is what your asking
dimetrodons are pelycosaurs and pelycosaurs are theraspids....right?  

 
actually, pelycosaurs are not therapsids (yes, the national list has this spelt wrong). Pelycosaurs were the precursors to the therapsids, and the therapsids developed out of them. The therapsids then developed into mammals. Wikipedia has a decent page on the evolution of mammals:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_mammals
oh, and dimetridon is a pelycosaur, its just one of the several typos on the list
 
			
					
				Re: Fossils
				Posted: April 21st, 2009, 7:04 am
				by oh joy
				what are the distinct differences between coelophysis and velociraptors???