thanks it was mentioned earlier in the forum so thank whoever said that. cuz i wouldnt have thought of doing it either if it werent for that postblufoster6 wrote:That's a pretty good idea. I would have never thought of that.

thanks it was mentioned earlier in the forum so thank whoever said that. cuz i wouldnt have thought of doing it either if it werent for that postblufoster6 wrote:That's a pretty good idea. I would have never thought of that.
i might have misinterpreted your question but isnt a dimetrodon a pelycosaur?Sunshine wrote: And also... Dimetrodon's listed under Theraspids on the fossil list... shouldn't it be a Pelycosaur?
I think that's what she's asking.soobsession wrote:i might have misinterpreted your question but isnt a dimetrodon a pelycosaur?Sunshine wrote: And also... Dimetrodon's listed under Theraspids on the fossil list... shouldn't it be a Pelycosaur?
LOL... i have like 40 tabs in my 4 or 5 inch binder....blufoster6 wrote:If you have a book, the easiest way to find things quick is to put tabs where the major phylla start. It helped out soooo much!!
actually, pelycosaurs are not therapsids (yes, the national list has this spelt wrong). Pelycosaurs were the precursors to the therapsids, and the therapsids developed out of them. The therapsids then developed into mammals. Wikipedia has a decent page on the evolution of mammals:soobsession wrote:gah...i think this is what your asking
dimetrodons are pelycosaurs and pelycosaurs are theraspids....right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests