This is all based on my assumption of what kendreaditya is trying to say, it may be totally wrong and misinterpretedTheChiScientist wrote:WAIT A MIN 150 MINS???? Explain this plzkendreaditya wrote:Actually, you could just make tables based on volume that run for about 150 mins each. This way you can use the table to predict the temperature more accurately and easily.CookiePie1 wrote:
You should create a graph for every variable range you test (volume, temperature, etc.)![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
kendreaditya is saying that suppose you have a 90C beaker and you run it for the first 40 minutes. It reaches 70C (just estimating). Then you essentially have a 70C beaker that you can run for another 40 minutes (and so on and so on). This would obviously work better if you had a really good heat retention as you could test more temperature without interruption. Running for 150 minutes also ensures you cover the full time interval (20-40 min Div C)
My issue, however, with this is that in my experience, the largest drop in temperature is when the hot beaker is first placed into a room temperature box. Within the first 5 minutes, the temperatures will equilibrate (at least somewhat), the beaker quickly giving up heat to the box (Newtons law of Cooling). From there the box and beaker will continue to lose heat, but at the same temperature, and at a much slower rate. If we run something for 150 minutes, we will essential cut out the first 5 minutes where the box and beaker rapidly reach equilibrium, and as this time period is the largest temperature drop, it will greatly influence the final temperatures.
Going to the example above, upon reaching 40 minutes and having a 70C beaker, the box will also be at around 70C, thus very little heat is leaving the beaker into the box. However at competition, a 70C beaker will be placed in a room temperature box (around 24C) and it will lose around 5-8C from simply heating the box up to an equilibrium temperature. Assuming everything else is perfect, your prediction going off the 150min graph would end up significantly off the actual value.