Page 53 of 58

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 21st, 2015, 3:46 pm
by Sidvin
Okay thank you...why didn't you bring the notes?

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 21st, 2015, 3:48 pm
by bernard
Sidvin wrote:Okay thank you...why didn't you bring the notes?
I was hoping my partner would print it out since it wasn't opening properly on my computer. Sigh, I did have a ton of the answers on my notes sheet.

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 21st, 2015, 3:49 pm
by Sidvin
Wow...that must have sucked

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 9:26 am
by Friedoyster3
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 9:39 am
by sjwon3789
Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 10:26 am
by JonB
sjwon3789 wrote:
Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?

They use a falling mass to move air which then moves the ball...

No, on a serious note I think many of the designs are pretty similar if using a falling mass to create air pressure. We are using a design that actually creates a vacuum, but it is very.... finicky.

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 10:45 am
by Friedoyster3
sjwon3789 wrote:
Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?
I have, but I'm not really too keen on describing them (beyond what JonB already has) this publicly against the will of the teams who's devices that I would be describing (including my own).
I will say that JonB is pretty much right on with that description, specifics aside.

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 8:22 pm
by Sidvin
Hey everyone,

I'm goin to state tm, but just realized that my height is .6 inch greater than its supposed to be
Do you think they will give a penalty for a small height difference...if so how much of a deduction?

Thx

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 22nd, 2015, 8:28 pm
by bernard
Sidvin wrote:Hey everyone,

I'm goin to state tm, but just realized that my height is .6 inch greater than its supposed to be
Do you think they will give a penalty for a small height difference...if so how much of a deduction?

Thx
By rule 6.d., a construction violation would place you behind all teams without construction violations. They will notice that your device is too tall and you'll be tiered so I highly advise that you find a solution to it. I hope I can help since I can imagine how frustrating it must be.

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Posted: April 26th, 2015, 9:03 am
by RBears6
I have a question regarding the running of Air Traj at my state competition this past weekend.

For the bucket shot, the proctors measured the distance that the ball landed away from the center of the bucket. From reading the rules, I thought that for a bucket shot, you could only get points by hitting or going in. I do not think the proctors added the distance away from the bucket to the final score, but it kinda threw me off that the proctors did this. Any thoughts?