Air Trajectory B/C

Sidvin
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Sidvin »

Okay thank you...why didn't you bring the notes?
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 745 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by bernard »

Sidvin wrote:Okay thank you...why didn't you bring the notes?
I was hoping my partner would print it out since it wasn't opening properly on my computer. Sigh, I did have a ton of the answers on my notes sheet.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
Sidvin
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Sidvin »

Wow...that must have sucked
Friedoyster3
Member
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:38 am
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Friedoyster3 »

buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.
University of Michigan Aerospace Engineering
Munster High School, Indiana
2015 Nationals: Bridge 12th; Air Traj 7th; Scrambler 6th; Geo Maps 5th; Team 6th!
"Science Olympiad is, was, and always will be one of the greatest things that ever happened to me."
sjwon3789
Member
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:45 pm
Division: C
State: VA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by sjwon3789 »

Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?
2013 Events: Boomilever, Keep the Heat, WIDI
2014 Events: Boomilever, Geologic Mapping, Mission Possible, Scrambler
2015 Events: Air Trajectory, Bridge Building, Mission Possible
JonB
Coach
Coach
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:00 pm
Division: C
State: FL
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by JonB »

sjwon3789 wrote:
Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?

They use a falling mass to move air which then moves the ball...

No, on a serious note I think many of the designs are pretty similar if using a falling mass to create air pressure. We are using a design that actually creates a vacuum, but it is very.... finicky.
Friedoyster3
Member
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:38 am
Division: C
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Friedoyster3 »

sjwon3789 wrote:
Friedoyster3 wrote:
buzzcutboy wrote:Any Idea what scores might go top 10, medal (top 6), and win nationals?
I would imagine to secure a spot in the top 6, a team might need to get under 5cm on both targets and be able to hit two buckets for 400 points.

Have you seen what design the top teams have been using?
I have, but I'm not really too keen on describing them (beyond what JonB already has) this publicly against the will of the teams who's devices that I would be describing (including my own).
I will say that JonB is pretty much right on with that description, specifics aside.
University of Michigan Aerospace Engineering
Munster High School, Indiana
2015 Nationals: Bridge 12th; Air Traj 7th; Scrambler 6th; Geo Maps 5th; Team 6th!
"Science Olympiad is, was, and always will be one of the greatest things that ever happened to me."
Sidvin
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Sidvin »

Hey everyone,

I'm goin to state tm, but just realized that my height is .6 inch greater than its supposed to be
Do you think they will give a penalty for a small height difference...if so how much of a deduction?

Thx
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 745 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by bernard »

Sidvin wrote:Hey everyone,

I'm goin to state tm, but just realized that my height is .6 inch greater than its supposed to be
Do you think they will give a penalty for a small height difference...if so how much of a deduction?

Thx
By rule 6.d., a construction violation would place you behind all teams without construction violations. They will notice that your device is too tall and you'll be tiered so I highly advise that you find a solution to it. I hope I can help since I can imagine how frustrating it must be.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
User avatar
RBears6
Member
Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:32 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by RBears6 »

I have a question regarding the running of Air Traj at my state competition this past weekend.

For the bucket shot, the proctors measured the distance that the ball landed away from the center of the bucket. From reading the rules, I thought that for a bucket shot, you could only get points by hitting or going in. I do not think the proctors added the distance away from the bucket to the final score, but it kinda threw me off that the proctors did this. Any thoughts?
#SpartanUp

2014-2015 events-
Experimental Design
Air Trajectory
GeoLogic Mapping

Return to “2015 Build Events”