Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

For anything Science Olympiad-related that might not fall under a specific event or competition.
UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F »

JoeyC wrote:but there's no more history in machines
Why would you want a notesheet-only event anyway
User avatar
JoeyC
Member
Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:43 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 503 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by JoeyC »

now that I have a binder I have to do something with it, regardless of the fact I only need one sheet
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Ohayo!
Dynamic Planet, Protein Modeling, Fast Facts, Thermodynamics
Dynamic Planet, Machines, Ornith
John 14:15
Scientia Potentia Est
Has Gotten Coronavirus: No

In memory of Ravi Zacharias, a friend of Christ.
User avatar
Name
Member
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:41 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by Name »

UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:
JoeyC wrote:So events like machines and thermo.... don't really need a big binder of notes, maybe just 1 sheet of notes, yet SciOlyCo always decides to give us a binder.
:?:
They do for the history questions

and besides, binders are easier to read in the first place
Chalker wrote:Let me provide some perspective on why we do this (with a caveat that other national committees have different opinions on this):

1. It reduces the burden on the event supervisors, as they don't have to be checking for extra pages or notes or debate whether 2 single sided sheets of paper pasted together are the same as 1 double sided sheet of paper.
2. It reduces the burden on the competitors, as they don't have to worry about using super small fonts to squeeze more information onto their notes or make judgment calls about what to include and what not to include
3. Contrary to your hypothesis about the reason being history, it pushes good event supervisors to create tests with more analysis and applied type questions instead of just reciting facts or history, as they know most teams will have the facts / history stuff in their binders.
4. It encourages teams to collect more information in advance of the event, which is somewhat correlated to actually studying and preparing for the event versus going in to it 'cold turkey'.
5. It mimics what happens in the real world, in that if a scientist or engineer is presented with a question they don't know the answer to, they'll try to use various resources to determine the answer instead of just guessing or skipping it altogether.

As a side note, we've been trying to put language in the rules limiting the scope of history / trivia type questions. I personally enjoy including them and think they are within the reasonable scope of knowledge of science and engineering, but I tend to be in the minority on the committee with regards to this.
South Woods MS, Syosset HS '21
BirdSO TD/ES
Past Events: Microbe, Invasive, Matsci, Fermi, Astro, Code, Fossils
1st place MIT Codebusters 2019-2020
1st place NYS Fermi Questions (2019), Astronomy and Codebusters (2021)
Science Olympiad Founder's Scholarship winner
TheCrazyChemist
Member
Member
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by TheCrazyChemist »

JoeyC wrote:So events like machines and thermo.... don't really need a big binder of notes, maybe just 1 sheet of notes, yet SciOlyCo always decides to give us a binder.
:?:
Imo the thermo binder was useful because we had a bunch of annoying conversions (like obscure temperature conversions) and formulas.
On the other hand, it was also the most annoying excuse for test writers to put literally anything on a test.
User avatar
hmmm
Member
Member
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:33 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by hmmm »

UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:
JoeyC wrote:So events like machines and thermo.... don't really need a big binder of notes, maybe just 1 sheet of notes, yet SciOlyCo always decides to give us a binder.
:?:
They do for the history questions

and besides, binders are easier to read in the first place
I believe that the only events which should get binders are the ID events.
If the bio,earth,and chem events get cheatsheets, why do physics events get binders? They can always remove history from the events.
And road definitely shouldn't get a binder/box/whatever.
Community 2017-2019
WWP North 2019-2020
2nd Place Water Quality 2019
Rocks and Minerals, Ecology
Disease Detectives, Fossils, Game On, Water Quality
2019-2020:
Dynamic Planet, Fossils, Ornithology, Water Quality
Wiki Userpage
Constantly Late Sassy #142
User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by Adi1008 »

hmmm wrote:
UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:
JoeyC wrote:So events like machines and thermo.... don't really need a big binder of notes, maybe just 1 sheet of notes, yet SciOlyCo always decides to give us a binder.
:?:
They do for the history questions

and besides, binders are easier to read in the first place
I believe that the only events which should get binders are the ID events.
If the bio,earth,and chem events get cheatsheets, why do physics events get binders? They can always remove history from the events.
And road definitely shouldn't get a binder/box/whatever.
I'm not sure about this. I think Astronomy is does a great job of incorporating a binder into the event (and goes even further to let competitors use a computer) while keeping the event conceptually challenging and fulfilling. I completely agree with chalker's rationale for using binders - a lot of my courses in college are structured the same way - and I think that if the events' tests are written well, it can make it a pretty good experience for everyone. Not every event should have a binder, but I think physics events/Astronomy having them is the least of Science Olympiad's problems.
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
AlfWeg
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 7:52 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by AlfWeg »

Anyone know anything about the protein modeling topic this year?
Slauson'16 Pio'20 UM'24

AlfWeg's Userpage
User avatar
hmmm
Member
Member
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:33 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by hmmm »

Adi1008 wrote:
hmmm wrote:
UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote: They do for the history questions

and besides, binders are easier to read in the first place
I believe that the only events which should get binders are the ID events.
If the bio,earth,and chem events get cheatsheets, why do physics events get binders? They can always remove history from the events.
And road definitely shouldn't get a binder/box/whatever.
I'm not sure about this. I think Astronomy is does a great job of incorporating a binder into the event (and goes even further to let competitors use a computer) while keeping the event conceptually challenging and fulfilling. I completely agree with chalker's rationale for using binders - a lot of my courses in college are structured the same way - and I think that if the events' tests are written well, it can make it a pretty good experience for everyone. Not every event should have a binder, but I think physics events/Astronomy having them is the least of Science Olympiad's problems.
I agree, but is there that much of a difference between the difficulty of physics events and bio,earth and chem events(Note:I don't do physics)? By this reasoning, many of the other events should get binders too. Road Scholar, on the other hand, requires few pages in a binder(according to my teammates), which could definitely fit on a cheatsheet.
Community 2017-2019
WWP North 2019-2020
2nd Place Water Quality 2019
Rocks and Minerals, Ecology
Disease Detectives, Fossils, Game On, Water Quality
2019-2020:
Dynamic Planet, Fossils, Ornithology, Water Quality
Wiki Userpage
Constantly Late Sassy #142
UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F »

hmmm wrote:
Adi1008 wrote:
hmmm wrote: I believe that the only events which should get binders are the ID events.
If the bio,earth,and chem events get cheatsheets, why do physics events get binders? They can always remove history from the events.
And road definitely shouldn't get a binder/box/whatever.
I'm not sure about this. I think Astronomy is does a great job of incorporating a binder into the event (and goes even further to let competitors use a computer) while keeping the event conceptually challenging and fulfilling. I completely agree with chalker's rationale for using binders - a lot of my courses in college are structured the same way - and I think that if the events' tests are written well, it can make it a pretty good experience for everyone. Not every event should have a binder, but I think physics events/Astronomy having them is the least of Science Olympiad's problems.
I agree, but is there that much of a difference between the difficulty of physics events and bio,earth and chem events(Note:I don't do physics)? By this reasoning, many of the other events should get binders too. Road Scholar, on the other hand, requires few pages in a binder(according to my teammates), which could definitely fit on a cheatsheet.
I honestly think more events having binders would be awesome, but in any case, I don't see it as a huge concern
AlfWeg
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 7:52 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Science Olympiad Events 2019-2020

Post by AlfWeg »

hmmm wrote:
Adi1008 wrote:
hmmm wrote: I believe that the only events which should get binders are the ID events.
If the bio,earth,and chem events get cheatsheets, why do physics events get binders? They can always remove history from the events.
And road definitely shouldn't get a binder/box/whatever.
I'm not sure about this. I think Astronomy is does a great job of incorporating a binder into the event (and goes even further to let competitors use a computer) while keeping the event conceptually challenging and fulfilling. I completely agree with chalker's rationale for using binders - a lot of my courses in college are structured the same way - and I think that if the events' tests are written well, it can make it a pretty good experience for everyone. Not every event should have a binder, but I think physics events/Astronomy having them is the least of Science Olympiad's problems.
I agree, but is there that much of a difference between the difficulty of physics events and bio,earth and chem events(Note:I don't do physics)? By this reasoning, many of the other events should get binders too. Road Scholar, on the other hand, requires few pages in a binder(according to my teammates), which could definitely fit on a cheatsheet.
Yeah, physics events do need the binder cuz of history(bunch of pointless facts about scientists, important inventions, etc...). Earth science events don’t need a binder because they don’t need the same kind of history. Also I feel there are more formulas in physics event.
Slauson'16 Pio'20 UM'24

AlfWeg's Userpage

Return to “General Competition”