Page 52 of 56
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 7:51 pm
by paleonaps
I get two years without them. Beat that.
Speaking of which, maniraptorans for the win!
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 7:51 pm
by quizbowl
paleonaps95 wrote:I get two years without them. Beat that.
Speaking of which, maniraptorans for the win!
ouch.
true, they do in fact win.
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 7:55 pm
by paleonaps
WIN!!!
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 7:56 pm
by quizbowl
if you say so, paleo.
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 7:57 pm
by paleonaps
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 8:00 pm
by quizbowl
okay, it's starting to get out of hand.
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 8:03 pm
by paleonaps
No, now it is...
I'll stop now.
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 18th, 2010, 8:21 pm
by quizbowl
we get the picture.
now: a fossils question (i know, pretty odd on a fossils forum).
what is usually the ratio of pleural lobe to axial lobe for trilobites?
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 23rd, 2010, 6:23 am
by gneissisnice
quizbowl13 wrote:we get the picture.
now: a fossils question (i know, pretty odd on a fossils forum).
what is usually the ratio of pleural lobe to axial lobe for trilobites?
Two pleural lobes to one axial lobe. Those are the three lobes that trilobites are named for (tri = three lobite= lobe).
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: June 23rd, 2010, 1:05 pm
by quizbowl
I knew that, but for relative lengths...
