Hovercraft B/C
- Ashernoel
 - Member

 - Posts: 345
 - Joined: January 27th, 2017, 1:31 pm
 - Division: Grad
 - State: IL
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 2 times
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
What are the tracks for hover like supposed to be like? On hard wood surface, perfect flat metal, or a regular lab table?
At my last tournament it was on a curvy lab table with a big bump in the middle, and I don't think that's how it should be.. impossible to calibrate and test for because the hover literally slowed down to a snails pace in the trough..
			
			
									
						At my last tournament it was on a curvy lab table with a big bump in the middle, and I don't think that's how it should be.. impossible to calibrate and test for because the hover literally slowed down to a snails pace in the trough..
NT '19
Harvard '23
						Harvard '23
- Adi1008
 - Moderator

 - Posts: 525
 - Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
 - Division: Grad
 - State: CA
 - Pronouns: He/Him/His
 - Has thanked: 155 times
 - Been thanked: 107 times
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
I don't think there's a standard track or anything. I've seen it be on plastic tables, floors, lab tables, tables pushed together, etc. MIT had it on these really fancy, well-made metal tracks. It would be really nice if there was a standard track, but I think it would make it much tougher for people running the events. I'd expect a metal track to be quite heavy and unwieldy, and it's unreasonable to expect every proctor to be able to build something like the track at MIT.Ashernoel wrote:What are the tracks for hover like supposed to be like? On hard wood surface, perfect flat metal, or a regular lab table?
At my last tournament it was on a curvy lab table with a big bump in the middle, and I don't think that's how it should be.. impossible to calibrate and test for because the hover literally slowed down to a snails pace in the trough..
I also agree that calibrating for Hovercraft is really tough, at least for me. My calibrations never help at all during a competition because the surfaces vary so much (or have bumps, vary in width, span multiple surfaces, etc) and friction/balance play such a huge role.
					Last edited by Adi1008 on February 26th, 2017, 10:18 am, edited 3 times in total.
									
			
						Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
						University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
- Adi1008
 - Moderator

 - Posts: 525
 - Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
 - Division: Grad
 - State: CA
 - Pronouns: He/Him/His
 - Has thanked: 155 times
 - Been thanked: 107 times
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
[accidental double post]
			
			
									
						Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
						University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
- Ashernoel
 - Member

 - Posts: 345
 - Joined: January 27th, 2017, 1:31 pm
 - Division: Grad
 - State: IL
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 2 times
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
That makes a lot of sense. Mass score is easy to prepare for, but it seems time score it a toss up. Teams try to get within the vicinity in their two runs. Using their first run as a baseline, they get one chance to adjust it for their final run. I guess the best preparation would just be to have a reliable way to change speed, and then hope you get lucky on the timing of the run.Adi1008 wrote:I don't think there's a standard track or anything. I've seen it be on plastic tables, floors, lab tables, tables pushed together, etc. MIT had it on these really fancy, well-made metal tracks. It would be really nice if there was a standard track, but I think it would make it much tougher for people running the events. I'd expect a metal track to be quite heavy and unwieldy, and it's unreasonable to expect every proctor to be able to build something like the track at MIT.Ashernoel wrote:What are the tracks for hover like supposed to be like? On hard wood surface, perfect flat metal, or a regular lab table?
At my last tournament it was on a curvy lab table with a big bump in the middle, and I don't think that's how it should be.. impossible to calibrate and test for because the hover literally slowed down to a snails pace in the trough..
I also agree that calibrating for Hovercraft is really tough, at least for me. My calibrations never help at all during a competition because the surfaces vary so much (or have bumps, vary in width, span multiple surfaces, etc) and friction/balance play such a huge role.
NT '19
Harvard '23
						Harvard '23
- Zioly
 - Member

 - Posts: 152
 - Joined: April 17th, 2016, 4:50 pm
 - Division: B
 - State: WA
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 0
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Agreed. I guess for this event, it's not so much as having pre-determined numbers that correspond with certain lengths or times (example: scrambler, air trajectory), but rather having a really good "feeling" for your device. It's definitely more variable than other build events, but it's definitely a challenge nonetheless.Ashernoel wrote:That makes a lot of sense. Mass score is easy to prepare for, but it seems time score it a toss up. Teams try to get within the vicinity in their two runs. Using their first run as a baseline, they get one chance to adjust it for their final run. I guess the best preparation would just be to have a reliable way to change speed, and then hope you get lucky on the timing of the run.Adi1008 wrote:I don't think there's a standard track or anything. I've seen it be on plastic tables, floors, lab tables, tables pushed together, etc. MIT had it on these really fancy, well-made metal tracks. It would be really nice if there was a standard track, but I think it would make it much tougher for people running the events. I'd expect a metal track to be quite heavy and unwieldy, and it's unreasonable to expect every proctor to be able to build something like the track at MIT.Ashernoel wrote:What are the tracks for hover like supposed to be like? On hard wood surface, perfect flat metal, or a regular lab table?
At my last tournament it was on a curvy lab table with a big bump in the middle, and I don't think that's how it should be.. impossible to calibrate and test for because the hover literally slowed down to a snails pace in the trough..
I also agree that calibrating for Hovercraft is really tough, at least for me. My calibrations never help at all during a competition because the surfaces vary so much (or have bumps, vary in width, span multiple surfaces, etc) and friction/balance play such a huge role.
Bottle Rockets: 5th Ecology: 9th Hovercraft: 14th Scrambler: 29th (with a failed run too ;))
Mousetrap Vehicle Hovercraft Ecology Experimental Design (or other inquiry :P) ...Yes, my profile picture is G2 apEX at the PGL Major Qual. :lol:
- 
				Tesel
 - Exalted Member

 - Posts: 161
 - Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
 - Division: C
 - State: MI
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 1 time
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
So I'm aware that I'm asking all these questions far too late in the season, the original plan was to have another teammate build and have me test.
However, I'd like to help out with revising our build since we have had problems with changing speed and with levitation.
Does anyone know the necessary specs of a lift blower fan that would work with a hovercraft for SciOly?
Also, how do you recommend changing speed? We've tried a slide resistor and a bad potentiometer with almost no success.
			
			
									
						However, I'd like to help out with revising our build since we have had problems with changing speed and with levitation.
Does anyone know the necessary specs of a lift blower fan that would work with a hovercraft for SciOly?
Also, how do you recommend changing speed? We've tried a slide resistor and a bad potentiometer with almost no success.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
						2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
- antoine_ego
 - Exalted Member

 - Posts: 387
 - Joined: May 24th, 2016, 5:37 pm
 - Division: Grad
 - State: MA
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 0
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
I'm not qualified to talk about blower fans, but as for standard computer fans, if you're aiming for maximum weight, you want at least 800 Pacals of static pressure with at least 120cfm. For changing speed, I'm not going to disclose my method, but I've seen successful designs that involve just slapping a resistor on the back fan. A good potentiometer could work, assuming you got one that could handle the current draws of your fan starting up.Tesel wrote:So I'm aware that I'm asking all these questions far too late in the season, the original plan was to have another teammate build and have me test.
However, I'd like to help out with revising our build since we have had problems with changing speed and with levitation.
Does anyone know the necessary specs of a lift blower fan that would work with a hovercraft for SciOly?
Also, how do you recommend changing speed? We've tried a slide resistor and a bad potentiometer with almost no success.
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19
						[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd 2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th 2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th 2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place! 2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd! 2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place! [/b]
- 
				Tesel
 - Exalted Member

 - Posts: 161
 - Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
 - Division: C
 - State: MI
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 1 time
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
That's fine, I don't expect everyone to share all the important details about changing speed since there's so many ways to do that.antoine_ego wrote:I'm not qualified to talk about blower fans, but as for standard computer fans, if you're aiming for maximum weight, you want at least 800 Pacals of static pressure with at least 120cfm. For changing speed, I'm not going to disclose my method, but I've seen successful designs that involve just slapping a resistor on the back fan. A good potentiometer could work, assuming you got one that could handle the current draws of your fan starting up.Tesel wrote:So I'm aware that I'm asking all these questions far too late in the season, the original plan was to have another teammate build and have me test.
However, I'd like to help out with revising our build since we have had problems with changing speed and with levitation.
Does anyone know the necessary specs of a lift blower fan that would work with a hovercraft for SciOly?
Also, how do you recommend changing speed? We've tried a slide resistor and a bad potentiometer with almost no success.
I'm intrigued by the idea of just swapping out resistors, sounds simple and replaceable and not as likely to fail.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
						2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Hello,windu34 wrote:That is a really good looking blower! Specs are definitely above the requirementRJohnson wrote:Here is the link: http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/e ... ND/2560506sciolyqa wrote: What is the part number of the motor from digi-key that suffice? We have been there and must have missed that.
We have this blower for lift and a small hobby motor mounted propeller for thrust. The blower is on 8.4 v NiMH battery. We are having trouble reducing the speed. We tried a few different wind tunnels, mesh, flaps and weights placement. Our craft is 2 Kg. The lift seems to be so powerful that a tiny thrust is enough and difficult to adjust. We have burnt one POT so a bit hesitant to use it again. Are there any other ideas to bring down speed? Thanks.
- 
				Tesel
 - Exalted Member

 - Posts: 161
 - Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
 - Division: C
 - State: MI
 - Has thanked: 0
 - Been thanked: 1 time
 
Re: Hovercraft B/C
OK, so now I'm confused.
Are the specs different for a blower fan and for just a normal fan?
Right now our team has picked out two options:
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/e ... ND/2560583
and
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/e ... ND/2560506
Which would be better for lift?
From what I see, the first is close to not enough CFM, while the second one is close to not enough Pa.
Would one be recommended over the other?
I ask just because these are expensive fans and I don't want to spend too much.
Also, anyone know of any 120mm fan grills that would definitely meet the spacing requirements?
			
			
									
						Are the specs different for a blower fan and for just a normal fan?
Right now our team has picked out two options:
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/e ... ND/2560583
and
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/e ... ND/2560506
Which would be better for lift?
From what I see, the first is close to not enough CFM, while the second one is close to not enough Pa.
Would one be recommended over the other?
I ask just because these are expensive fans and I don't want to spend too much.
Also, anyone know of any 120mm fan grills that would definitely meet the spacing requirements?
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
						2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
	
