Re: Mission Possible C
Posted: April 5th, 2014, 4:40 pm
burning is considered a chemical reaction, correct?
Burning is a chemical reaction, yes.Phys1cs wrote:burning is considered a chemical reaction, correct?
I have a slightly different timing device that I'm unsure of. Say I have a tank of water that has a plug, which releases water when a motor pulls the plug out. While the timer isn't reliant on the power, I am not sure.twisty14 wrote:That would be a DQ. Here's a link to a rule clarification, it's slightly different but works the same. http://www.soinc.org/node/1326drifter601 wrote:What do you guys think about a rack and pinion time managing device? It's basically gears moving (powered by a motor). I thought we could adjust it to give us more or less time. However, in the rules, it states that all time adjusting tasks in the MP should be non-electrical at the start, middle, and end of that task. So would a rack and pinion get us DQ'ed?
Also, when scoring for time, if you go over the specified time, do you still get the points for "every second up to the time" and THEN get deductions for going over? Or is it JUST deductions?
As for the timing points. From my understanding you get both sets of points, even if you go past. Once you get to the nationals level though the timing points are vital. You need every point you can get.
That timers fine. It's no being powered by electricity, it's only started by something that uses electricity. Basically a good test for whether or not your timer is legal, is if, while your timer is running, would removing all of the batteries in the machine make the timer stop, if it does then it's an illegal timer. If it doesn't you should be good to go.A Person wrote:I have a slightly different timing device that I'm unsure of. Say I have a tank of water that has a plug, which releases water when a motor pulls the plug out. While the timer isn't reliant on the power, I am not sure.twisty14 wrote:That would be a DQ. Here's a link to a rule clarification, it's slightly different but works the same. http://www.soinc.org/node/1326drifter601 wrote:What do you guys think about a rack and pinion time managing device? It's basically gears moving (powered by a motor). I thought we could adjust it to give us more or less time. However, in the rules, it states that all time adjusting tasks in the MP should be non-electrical at the start, middle, and end of that task. So would a rack and pinion get us DQ'ed?
Also, when scoring for time, if you go over the specified time, do you still get the points for "every second up to the time" and THEN get deductions for going over? Or is it JUST deductions?
As for the timing points. From my understanding you get both sets of points, even if you go past. Once you get to the nationals level though the timing points are vital. You need every point you can get.
My timer consists of a mechanical object that slowly turns and connects an electrical circuit when it is finished. To adjust the time, I change the amount that the mechanical object is adjusted. No electrical components of the transfer are adjusted.All transfers take time, but any continuous action designed to take up time must not be electrical. In
addition, at State & National adjusting a transfer that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the
beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation.
If going by twisty's answer to mine, I would count it as legal. I think that if as long as all the batteries were gone and it was just mechanical, that is a good way to tell if it's electrical, according to Twisty14. However, how is the device turned? Last year, tons of teams were using a screw being turned by a motor, and that was almost boring to watch. I think that's what the writers were trying to prevent from occurring this year. Specifically, it was a wingnut on a screw with a motor turning it until it hit a microswitch, basically the principles of a battery buggy. I think using electricity as an end result would make things much easier, and hopefully I'm not wrong, as my own mission uses something of that nature.patil215 wrote:I have a question about the timer in my device. The rules state:
My timer consists of a mechanical object that slowly turns and connects an electrical circuit when it is finished. To adjust the time, I change the amount that the mechanical object is adjusted. No electrical components of the transfer are adjusted.All transfers take time, but any continuous action designed to take up time must not be electrical. In
addition, at State & National adjusting a transfer that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the
beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation.
I'm not sure if this could be considered illegal. I know that the purpose of the rule was to make sure no one was putting in a delay of electrical nature like a timer circuit (hence the only state and nationals part). However, the timer does do a mechanical to electrical transfer, but I do not adjust the electrical part of the transfer - the time is changed by simply winding the mechanical part different amounts.
What do you guys think?
The rules quoted above state that "adjusting a transfer that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation". Our team interpreted that as meaning that electricity could not be used in any way to start the adjustable portion of the task or to sense its end. By this interpretation, your timer would be in violation. The key word for us was "utilizes". That makes it very broad and applicable to possibly even an EMS transfer.A Person wrote:If going by twisty's answer to mine, I would count it as legal. I think that if as long as all the batteries were gone and it was just mechanical, that is a good way to tell if it's electrical, according to Twisty14. However, how is the device turned? Last year, tons of teams were using a screw being turned by a motor, and that was almost boring to watch. I think that's what the writers were trying to prevent from occurring this year. Specifically, it was a wingnut on a screw with a motor turning it until it hit a microswitch, basically the principles of a battery buggy. I think using electricity as an end result would make things much easier, and hopefully I'm not wrong, as my own mission uses something of that nature.patil215 wrote:I have a question about the timer in my device. The rules state:
My timer consists of a mechanical object that slowly turns and connects an electrical circuit when it is finished. To adjust the time, I change the amount that the mechanical object is adjusted. No electrical components of the transfer are adjusted.All transfers take time, but any continuous action designed to take up time must not be electrical. In
addition, at State & National adjusting a transfer that utilizes electricity in any way (either at the
beginning, middle, or end of operation) intended to accomplish the ideal time is a violation.
I'm not sure if this could be considered illegal. I know that the purpose of the rule was to make sure no one was putting in a delay of electrical nature like a timer circuit (hence the only state and nationals part). However, the timer does do a mechanical to electrical transfer, but I do not adjust the electrical part of the transfer - the time is changed by simply winding the mechanical part different amounts.
What do you guys think?