To clarify, that's for division C.noobforce wrote:At NJ States, 1st place has a 2400s efficiency and second place was 2250.
And congrats once again
Scores
-
nxtscholar
- Member
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:25 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores
And congrats once again
-
S4BB
- Member
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:39 pm
- Division: B
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores
We had our regional yesterday, JV teams took 1st and 4th with 3461 and 2400ish, Varsity took second with a little over 3000, all broke early. Division B
-
dholdgreve
- Coach
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:20 pm
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Scores
Top 3 Bridges at the Piqua, Ohio Regional, Division B were all over 3300
Dan Holdgreve
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
-
SPP SciO
- Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:21 am
- Division: B
- State: NY
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Scores
Totally stymied by these 3k+ bridges - hats off to those teams. To imagine less than 5g of balsa supporting a bucket that's heavy for a person to hold - wow.
At the NYC regional, 832 was good enough for a 6th place medal! Arched bridges seemed to win the day but I have no idea about the top placing scores.
At the NYC regional, 832 was good enough for a 6th place medal! Arched bridges seemed to win the day but I have no idea about the top placing scores.
-
JZhang1
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores
wtf why is everyone so good 
Weight: 3.33 g
Held: ~9
Efficiency: ~2600
Division B
Weight: 3.33 g
Held: ~9
Efficiency: ~2600
Division B
Ward Melville High School -> Princeton University
-
bernard
- Administrator
- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 165 times
- Been thanked: 734 times
Re: Scores
I'd say you're quite good; I still struggle with making bridges less than 5 grams.JZhang1 wrote:wtf why is everyone so good :!:
Weight: 3.33 g
Held: ~9
Efficiency: ~2600
Division B
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
JZhang1
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores
all deez 3000 efficiencies r pretty intimidatingI'd say you're quite good; I still struggle with making bridges less than 5 grams.
Ward Melville High School -> Princeton University
-
John Richardsim
- Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:54 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Scores
I found this video on YouTube of a bridge at an invitational. It held full load and in the video description, it said the efficiency was 3641 for division C. I was really surprised by this, because it looked rather heavy (or at least heavier than 4.12g). Does this seem possible to any of you all? Here's the url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
"This is close enough to perfect for me." --Dave Stieb
-
DoctaDave
- Member
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:59 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores
I really like making bridges!John Richardsim wrote:I found this video on YouTube of A footbridge at an invitational. It held full load and in tHe video description, it said tHe efficiency was 3641 for division C. I was really surprised by this, because it looked rather heavy (or at least heavier then 4.12g). Does this seem possible to any of you all? Here's tHe url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
