Page 6 of 20
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 21st, 2016, 3:43 pm
by rfscoach
ThatRoboGuy wrote:PianoDoc wrote:These ought to be correct, but I might be wrong.
Mentor 1 - 72
Chardon - 89
Solon 1 - 95
Solon 2 - 97
Mentor 2 - 98
I believe this is probably correct. Not sure if exact though.
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 22nd, 2016, 5:24 am
by samlan16
rfscoach wrote:ThatRoboGuy wrote:PianoDoc wrote:These ought to be correct, but I might be wrong.
Mentor 1 - 72
Chardon - 89
Solon 1 - 95
Solon 2 - 97
Mentor 2 - 98
I believe this is probably correct. Not sure if exact though.
...what were you trying to say?
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 22nd, 2016, 7:10 am
by PianoDoc
Correct Scores:
Mentor 1 - 70 (The sheet says 70, but they announced 72 because of an un-updated discrepancy in (I think it was) Disease Detectives)
Chardon - 89
Solon 1 - 95
Solon 2 - 97
Mentor 2 - 98
Kenston 1 - 171
Mayfield 1 - 173
Beachwood 1 - 180
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 22nd, 2016, 8:53 am
by LastYearDivC
Any detailed results from Case? Can't find them anywhere. Thanks!
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 23rd, 2016, 3:37 pm
by inwhite
This is the score sheet that I believe was sent out to all the coaches.
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 24th, 2016, 2:30 pm
by ThatRoboGuy
samlan16 wrote:rfscoach wrote:ThatRoboGuy wrote:
I believe this is probably correct. Not sure if exact though.
...what were you trying to say?
rfscoach tried to mathematically prove that the other guy was wrong but he checked his math, realized an error, and retracted it without explanation within a few minutes.
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 27th, 2016, 8:46 pm
by varunscs11
breakingankles wrote:Unome wrote:
Random Notes:
Div B
- Solon is looking weaker and Tower Heights is looking stronger (as expected coming off of their win last week).
- Beckendorff appears not to have many event bombs, which leads me to think that they've declined from the last two years.
- Piedmont seems a bit weaker than last year, but it could just be because they haven't been to any previous tournaments with the National event slate.
- SAA looks strong, but I don't think it'll be enough to beat Marie Murphy (but a lot could change in the next two months).
- Springhouse is split to the point where it seems impossible to tell how they would have done with a stacked team.
- Meads Mill seems to be much the same as last year, perhaps a bit weaker.
- Bearden has another strong showing at an invitational (and will likely still not break the top 20 at Nationals...).
Div C
- Solon, Mentor, Mason, and Centerville are all clearly above the rest of the teams, despite all having split teams. It seems like Ohio C will be another four-way showdown.
- International Academy did well, but I'm not sure whether this is Central or East (although I'd bet on Central). Even so, they were stacked but couldn't match either of Solon's split teams.
- Northville did well, and might be able to repeat last year's win over Grand Haven (although it's hard to tell since Grand Haven never goes to invites...)
- Carmel did well, but probably not well enough to beat Munster at State (assuming Munster hasn't gotten drastically worse)
Division C Ohio is looking to be super competitive again, i think whichever teams make it will be top 10 at nationals
Also yeah I think all the good people from the teams that got 1st and 2nd at nationals probably went to high school and i heard their coach left so Beckendorff is in decline right now
This is so late, but I've heard the same about Beckendorff--> most of the people are prob at Seven Lakes now. Also their coach is now at Seven Lakes. Nonetheless they are going to destroy Texas Division B state as usual, especially since Riverwood got 4th at regionals and is not going to state (most likely). So essentially, in Div B, teams like Kealing and Cinco Ranch are competing for second. It's interesting to note that this is where LASA used to be a long time ago (2007-2011).
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: February 27th, 2016, 11:14 pm
by Adi1008
varunscs11 wrote:breakingankles wrote:Unome wrote:
Random Notes:
Div B
- Solon is looking weaker and Tower Heights is looking stronger (as expected coming off of their win last week).
- Beckendorff appears not to have many event bombs, which leads me to think that they've declined from the last two years.
- Piedmont seems a bit weaker than last year, but it could just be because they haven't been to any previous tournaments with the National event slate.
- SAA looks strong, but I don't think it'll be enough to beat Marie Murphy (but a lot could change in the next two months).
- Springhouse is split to the point where it seems impossible to tell how they would have done with a stacked team.
- Meads Mill seems to be much the same as last year, perhaps a bit weaker.
- Bearden has another strong showing at an invitational (and will likely still not break the top 20 at Nationals...).
Div C
- Solon, Mentor, Mason, and Centerville are all clearly above the rest of the teams, despite all having split teams. It seems like Ohio C will be another four-way showdown.
- International Academy did well, but I'm not sure whether this is Central or East (although I'd bet on Central). Even so, they were stacked but couldn't match either of Solon's split teams.
- Northville did well, and might be able to repeat last year's win over Grand Haven (although it's hard to tell since Grand Haven never goes to invites...)
- Carmel did well, but probably not well enough to beat Munster at State (assuming Munster hasn't gotten drastically worse)
Division C Ohio is looking to be super competitive again, i think whichever teams make it will be top 10 at nationals
Also yeah I think all the good people from the teams that got 1st and 2nd at nationals probably went to high school and i heard their coach left so Beckendorff is in decline right now
This is so late, but I've heard the same about Beckendorff--> most of the people are prob at Seven Lakes now. Also their coach is now at Seven Lakes. Nonetheless they are going to destroy Texas Division B state as usual, especially since Riverwood got 4th at regionals and is not going to state (most likely). So essentially, in Div B, teams like Kealing and Cinco Ranch are competing for second. It's interesting to note that this is where LASA used to be a long time ago (2007-2011).
Unfortunately, Cinco Ranch JHS SO doesn't exist anymore
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: March 4th, 2016, 2:20 pm
by Unome
Adi1008 wrote:varunscs11 wrote:breakingankles wrote:
Division C Ohio is looking to be super competitive again, i think whichever teams make it will be top 10 at nationals
Also yeah I think all the good people from the teams that got 1st and 2nd at nationals probably went to high school and i heard their coach left so Beckendorff is in decline right now
This is so late, but I've heard the same about Beckendorff--> most of the people are prob at Seven Lakes now. Also their coach is now at Seven Lakes. Nonetheless they are going to destroy Texas Division B state as usual, especially since Riverwood got 4th at regionals and is not going to state (most likely). So essentially, in Div B, teams like Kealing and Cinco Ranch are competing for second. It's interesting to note that this is where LASA used to be a long time ago (2007-2011).
Unfortunately, Cinco Ranch JHS SO doesn't exist anymore
Ok... so maybe I can understand a team that's been to Nationals for a while dropping out, but why would a first-year nationals team quit!?
Re: Ohio 2016
Posted: March 4th, 2016, 2:49 pm
by maxxxxx
Unome wrote:Adi1008 wrote:varunscs11 wrote:
This is so late, but I've heard the same about Beckendorff--> most of the people are prob at Seven Lakes now. Also their coach is now at Seven Lakes. Nonetheless they are going to destroy Texas Division B state as usual, especially since Riverwood got 4th at regionals and is not going to state (most likely). So essentially, in Div B, teams like Kealing and Cinco Ranch are competing for second. It's interesting to note that this is where LASA used to be a long time ago (2007-2011).
Unfortunately, Cinco Ranch JHS SO doesn't exist anymore
Ok... so maybe I can understand a team that's been to Nationals for a while dropping out, but why would a first-year nationals team quit!?
It could be due to a lack of funding for the club, which seems to be happening even in well funded school districts.