SciOly Assassination 117: Winter Olympics

[kate!]

Just a reminder to everyone, we may or may not post using our accounts to disrupt the game.

Are you the sassy?

[UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F]

-

I accuse WhatScience because of that post.

Meh, we get an accusation for every successful protect, and we have five together right now, so might as well.

EDIT: And if I'm wrong, I can still help with clues.

EDIT 2: Never mind, I can't accuse if I've already protected apparently. In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard. If we get a protection right, then officer who protected correctly please accuse.

[dxu46]

-

I accuse WhatScience because of that post.

Meh, we get an accusation for every successful protect, and we have five together right now, so might as well.

EDIT: And if I'm wrong, I can still help with clues.

EDIT 2: Never mind, I can't accuse if I've already protected apparently. In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard. If we get a protection right, then officer who protected correctly please accuse.

You only have that evidence. Is there any other evidence you have to back your point? Also, if it turns out you are wrong, this game will turn out awfully similar to the last one. I suggest you wait until you have more evidence and/or more accusations.

[Anomaly]

-

I accuse WhatScience because of that post.

Meh, we get an accusation for every successful protect, and we have five together right now, so might as well.

EDIT: And if I'm wrong, I can still help with clues.

EDIT 2: Never mind, I can't accuse if I've already protected apparently. In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard. If we get a protection right, then officer who protected correctly please accuse.

You only have that evidence. Is there any other evidence you have to back your point? Also, if it turns out you are wrong, this game will turn out awfully similar to the last one. I suggest you wait until you have more evidence and/or more accusations.

I tried to tell him... thank god it doesn't count for anything since he already protected.

[pb5754]

-

I accuse WhatScience because of that post.

Meh, we get an accusation for every successful protect, and we have five together right now, so might as well.

EDIT: And if I'm wrong, I can still help with clues.

EDIT 2: Never mind, I can't accuse if I've already protected apparently. In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard. If we get a protection right, then officer who protected correctly please accuse.

You only have that evidence. Is there any other evidence you have to back your point? Also, if it turns out you are wrong, this game will turn out awfully similar to the last one. I suggest you wait until you have more evidence and/or more accusations.

I think you guys may have skipped over this post???

Just a reminder to everyone, we may or may not post using our accounts to disrupt the game.

Are you the sassy?

WhatScience is definitely a sassy. Kate! probably saw WhatScience's original post (Her post came 2 minutes after the original, and the original was edited six minutes after that.) First of all, we means that he is referring to himself and his accomplice, and clearly from the perspective of a sassy. Also, if it wasn't him, he wouldn't simply mysteriously delete his post without an explanation.

On another note, WhatScience is also from NJ soooooo...

[EOOTA]

In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard.

Supported.

[Tailsfan101]

Just a reminder to everyone, we may or may not post using our accounts to disrupt the game.

Are you the sassy?

WhatScience is definitely a sassy. Kate! probably saw WhatScience's original post (Her post came 2 minutes after the original, and the original was edited six minutes after that.) First of all, we means that he is referring to himself and his accomplice, and clearly from the perspective of a sassy. Also, if it wasn't him, he wouldn't simply mysteriously delete his post without an explanation.

On another note, WhatScience is also from NJ soooooo...

Little mistakes like that...

Here's my take on it: WhatScience? is a Sassy. He decided to give out a clarification for the game, but failed to realize that he was still logged into his original account. After he made the post, he probably went off to look at something else on the site, and not too long after came back to this game and saw what had happened (after kate! had quoted him). He then proceeded to edit the post, trying to make it seem as if nothing had happened (why else would he blank the post?), but alas, he was too late...

Oof. The only question remaining for now is who's to accuse him after the next clue.

EDIT: After reading UTF's post, I agree that whoever gets the correct protect should accuse WhatScience?. Just to be safe.

[daydreamer0023]

In turn, let me pressure the Assassinators to change the accusation rules back to standard.

Supported.

You seem to have been on here for a bit...who are you? Are you the official lurking sassy?

[pb5754]

I think EOOTA stands for Eternal Order of the Assassins or somethings.

No idea who controls the account though.

[Tailsfan101]

I think EOOTA stands for Eternal Order of the Assassins or somethings.

No idea who controls the account though.

As far as I know, the "EOOTA" is an account that all past Sassies are given access to. It stands for "Eternal Order of the Assassinators".