Page 6 of 51

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: September 28th, 2017, 8:54 pm
by Snarknado
daydreamer0023 wrote: Also, for the single battery source bonus, would only a single physical battery qualify for this (ie. 4 AA 1.5 V batteries wired together wouldn't count because the source is made of 4 separate batteries)? How was this scored in the past?
Same question.

Also, while this isn't the place for official clarifications, what do you interpret to be a "commercial battery"; a battery one could purchase from a grocery store, or just any purchasable non-industrial battery (under 14.4v and non-lithium of course)?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: September 29th, 2017, 4:35 am
by ScottMaurer19
Snarknado wrote:
daydreamer0023 wrote: Also, for the single battery source bonus, would only a single physical battery qualify for this (ie. 4 AA 1.5 V batteries wired together wouldn't count because the source is made of 4 separate batteries)? How was this scored in the past?
Same question.

Also, while this isn't the place for official clarifications, what do you interpret to be a "commercial battery"; a battery one could purchase from a grocery store, or just any purchasable non-industrial battery (under 14.4v and non-lithium of course)?
I thought this was fairly clear... Basically they are ruling out homemade or improvised battery sources to avoid any safety issues. As for the single battery bonus, I'm pretty sure they literally mean one physical battery.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: September 29th, 2017, 7:54 am
by Bluejet1179
Do you think using an one arduino with a bunch of sensors would be allowed? It would be a great way to connect the actions

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: September 29th, 2017, 8:20 am
by andrew lorino
Bluejet1179 wrote:Do you think using an one arduino with a bunch of sensors would be allowed? It would be a great way to connect the actions
According to previous not-clarifications, an Arduino would count as an adjustable device and as such, could only be used for one task, i.e. it could not sense a change in a task, trigger another, and then sense a change in that task. You could get around that by having one Arduino per task, but that would get expensive, and kind of defeat the purpose of the event (IMO not enough to violate General Rule #1). Also please read the thread before you ask a question, this was already answered very extensively by Chalker.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 5th, 2017, 2:28 pm
by SluffAndRuff
In 4.b.viii, how would you make a pulley with IMA 0.50? Thanks!

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 5th, 2017, 5:42 pm
by ScottMaurer19
SluffAndRuff wrote:In 4.b.viii, how would you make a pulley with IMA 0.50? Thanks!
Take a simple block and tackle (IMA of 2) and reverse the placement of the effort and the load. This will require the effort to have twice the amount force but only move half the distance.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 13th, 2017, 5:25 am
by andrew lorino
What would qualify as a task being powered by electricity? Would it mean that there could be no electrical components whatsoever, or can there be sensors tripped by non-electrical components? Or can that be put into another task?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 21st, 2017, 6:20 pm
by SluffAndRuff
I'm no chemistry person and google is of little help so bear with me on this question...

For 4.xi when you need to "use a thermal reaction which expands a gas" does this mean that the reaction has to be caused by heat or can an exothermic reaction be used? Also for "expanding" a gas, does producing a gas fall under this category? Thanks!

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 23rd, 2017, 8:14 am
by andrew lorino
SluffAndRuff wrote:I'm no chemistry person and google is of little help so bear with me on this question...

For 4.xi when you need to "use a thermal reaction which expands a gas" does this mean that the reaction has to be caused by heat or can an exothermic reaction be used? Also for "expanding" a gas, does producing a gas fall under this category? Thanks!
My interpretation is that it can only refer to expanding a gas using heat, without adding any gas via chemical means.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: October 23rd, 2017, 8:42 am
by ScottMaurer19
andrew lorino wrote:
SluffAndRuff wrote:I'm no chemistry person and google is of little help so bear with me on this question...

For 4.xi when you need to "use a thermal reaction which expands a gas" does this mean that the reaction has to be caused by heat or can an exothermic reaction be used? Also for "expanding" a gas, does producing a gas fall under this category? Thanks!
My interpretation is that it can only refer to expanding a gas using heat, without adding any gas via chemical means.
I believe that is what was said at the coaches clinic.