Scioly.org

bleh...the 6th movie sucked pretty bad. since when was there a little goose chase with fire and stuff through a wheat field or whatever that was in front of the weasley's house? some things were really underexplained...though a knew from reading the book what it was about...

49ers wrote: no crap harry dies in the book so they will have to kill him off in the movie

yeah but he does come back to life doesnt he? like theres that whole scene when hes in that train station-like place and meets dumbledore and such...

splitting the 7th into two is such a rip off...especially if the two movies are going to be out at different times...ugh...so much suspense and a waste of money...two tickets...geez...

ik... the first halfs gonna b boring...
like We're camping...............oh look a doe. FIN

I didn't think 6th movie was too bad, not too good, but not too bad.

Alan Rickman was fantastic in it though...

soobsession wrote:bleh...the 6th movie sucked pretty bad. since when was there a little goose chase with fire and stuff through a wheat field or whatever that was in front of the weasley's house? some things were really underexplained...though a knew from reading the book what it was about...

49ers wrote: no crap harry dies in the book so they will have to kill him off in the movie

yeah but he does come back to life doesnt he? like theres that whole scene when hes in that train station-like place and meets dumbledore and such...

splitting the 7th into two is such a rip off...especially if the two movies are going to be out at different times...ugh...so much suspense and a waste of money...two tickets...geez...

sheesh that is a rip-off
and i did know that he does go to King's Cross Station

49ers wrote:

soobsession wrote:bleh...the 6th movie sucked pretty bad. since when was there a little goose chase with fire and stuff through a wheat field or whatever that was in front of the weasley's house? some things were really underexplained...though a knew from reading the book what it was about...

49ers wrote: no crap harry dies in the book so they will have to kill him off in the movie

yeah but he does come back to life doesnt he? like theres that whole scene when hes in that train station-like place and meets dumbledore and such...

splitting the 7th into two is such a rip off...especially if the two movies are going to be out at different times...ugh...so much suspense and a waste of money...two tickets...geez...

sheesh that is a rip-off
and i did know that he does go to King's Cross Station

yeah...most ppl will probably just watch part 2 of it

yeah thats the best part of the book because of all the fighting scences and action

omg the 6th movie wasnt that good
i mean i've seen way better ones
they cut so much out i mean there wasn't the whole war at hogwarts at the end and voldemort didnt even appear in the movie!!! unless you count memories and stuff
the movie was just really slow.. at most parts

I know they skipped the war and fight scenes when dumbledore died but i still liked the movie(but i didnt love it like I usually do)

I thought it was pretty good, but there was lots of room for improvement. I would say it's better than a lot of people are giving it credit for though just because of the changes from the book.

I saw the 6th movie in chinese b/c I'm in china right now.
darn I wish I saw it on english because the characters all sounded weird speaking in chinese,
but I'm too impatient to wait until I get back to the US.

It was slow-paced and they totally buried the huge war in hogwarts at the end of the book.
I'd say it isn't as good as the other movies were.

EASTstroudsburg13 wrote:I thought it was pretty good, but there was lots of room for improvement. I would say it's better than a lot of people are giving it credit for though just because of the changes from the book.

I gave it the credit it deserved. it was fairly good, but they should have put in the war scene