Page 49 of 65

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 30th, 2009, 6:18 pm
by GGuy5
Look on the bright side dude you got a medal :D

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 30th, 2009, 7:22 pm
by Deeisenberg
courage7856 wrote:Plants are okay, but in my opinion, there aren't enough differences between Annularia and Calamites.
That is because they are the same thing. They are obsolete taxa. Annularia is just the leaves, and calamites is the bark.

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 30th, 2009, 9:17 pm
by maggymay
inuyashakusho wrote:
courage7856 wrote:Plants are okay, but in my opinion, there aren't enough differences between Annularia and Calamites.
That is because they are the same thing. They are obsolete taxa. Annularia is just the leaves, and calamites is the bark.
They're CONFUSING, it took me forever (duh) to figure that out.

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 30th, 2009, 10:29 pm
by dudeincolorado
Wait. Then why are they in different geni? :O latin did come in handy!

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 6:25 am
by Flavorflav
inuyashakusho wrote:
courage7856 wrote:Plants are okay, but in my opinion, there aren't enough differences between Annularia and Calamites.
That is because they are the same thing. They are obsolete taxa. Annularia is just the leaves, and calamites is the bark.
Ouch. That's pretty embarrassing for whoever made up this list.

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 1:40 pm
by gneissisnice
Because they were classified as two different genera until it was discovered that they are the same organism. The list kept that probably so they could ask a question like "What do the two have in common?" or something dumb like that.

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 4:40 pm
by dudeincolorado
I'm sorry but really? Wow.

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 4:41 pm
by croman74
By putting more items on the list, it makes S.O. seem more important. ;)

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 4:50 pm
by blufoster6
croman74 wrote:By putting more items on the list, it makes S.O. seem more important. ;)
LOL :D Probably true though!

Re: Fossils

Posted: March 31st, 2009, 5:27 pm
by Deeisenberg
dudeincolorado wrote:Wait. Then why are they in different geni? :O latin did come in handy!
Unfortunately, taking Latin never helps with anything, except for the destruction of your soul.

Alas, you see, the plural of genus is not geni, it is genera.