For what it's worth, I do believe that Mystery Architecture had the same ES as Mystery Design last year - which was also the most baffling of events, in terms of deviating from the prescribed scoring rubric in the rules.sciencepeeps wrote:Wow... that is absolutely horrible. I’ve never seen an event run like that.wzhang5460 wrote:NYS Div B States Mystery Design was disappointing.
The event had the worst scoring rubric possible. We were given 12 paper cups and nothing else and asked to build a tower at least 1.5m tall. If you stacked all the cups end to end, it would only be about 1.2m or so. The formula for the scoring was the number of cups you did not alter, (cut, rip, tears count as altering) plus the square root of the tower height (If it was below 1.5m, the height would count as 0), divided by the time block you were in. (each time block was ten or so minutes, for a total of 4 time blocks). It was literally impossible to get a freestanding 1.5 m tower, so much so that only 2 teams in the entire competition managed to do so.
Eventually, this turned into a "who could give up the fastest" sort of challenge. The longer you went, the more cups you would alter and the more time you would use. We realized nobody would build up to 1.5m (the majority of the height scores would be 0) and gave up in the 2nd time block with 6 cups not altered, with a final score of 3. However, if a team gave up in the 1st time block with no altered cups, they would've ended up with a score of 12 and easily top 5.
We placed 11th, which isn't that bad of a bomb considering the event, but I wish we would've gotten 10thso we could get a medal for giving up.
Personally, I'm happy, since my students got 1st place, which was our only state gold medal in history. But, when you look at the score sheet, and see that out of the top 10 overall teams, only two earned top-10 in Mystery Architecture ... yet, five medals went to teams 27th and below - you can tell it's a "wildcard" event. I imagine that this event is one of the least-correlated with team success (along with WIDI) but I agree that at NYS, it wasn't a high-quality event.