Hovercraft B/C
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hovercraft B/C
I was working on the Raisbeck Aviation test (from the test exchange), and while I made a couple stupid mistakes, I was puzzled by the key for a couple problems. Could anyone look at #19 and #20? I'm not quite sure why the answers would be negative, or how we could know whether to answer them as negative values.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
Re: Hovercraft B/C
That should probably work. I've seen people do it and be fine with it.404ic wrote:Is it okay if I use electrical tape to insulate the wire connections?reed303 wrote:S-O Battery policy says:404ic wrote:Hi y'all,
Am I allowed to use alligator clips to wire my hovercraft? I remember some team getting chewed out last year for doing that...
• insulate the battery terminals and attached wires when not connected;
• do not use bare wire at any time in the construction of your device;
• make sure that all wiring connections are properly insulated
https://www.soinc.org/sites/default/fil ... _18_17.pdf
We've soldered & shrink-tubed some connections, and used wire nuts for others.. You could also use crimp connectors for wire-to-wire splices. The connections to lugs on motors and switches were soldered.
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Is it ok to use a flexible mesh, or does it have to be rigid to cover the propellers? The rules say that a 3/8" dowel should not touch the prop, but does this mean that if I press it against a flexible shield and the shield flexes and touches the prop it will be not ok? Or is it enough that the dowel doesn't go through the hole and touch the prop?
-
- Member
- Posts: 225
- Joined: February 12th, 2017, 8:06 am
- Division: B
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
A flexible shield is fine as long as the dowel can not directly touch the prop, like without pressing or moving anything.cmurthy wrote:Is it ok to use a flexible mesh, or does it have to be rigid to cover the propellers? The rules say that a 3/8" dowel should not touch the prop, but does this mean that if I press it against a flexible shield and the shield flexes and touches the prop it will be not ok? Or is it enough that the dowel doesn't go through the hole and touch the prop?
2019 events: Water Quality, Battery Buggy, Elastic Launch Glider, Density Lab, Circuit Lab, Thermodynamics
R.C Murphy Co-Captain
Dank Memes Area Homeschool Team member
R.C Murphy Co-Captain
Dank Memes Area Homeschool Team member
-
- Member
- Posts: 110
- Joined: January 18th, 2017, 6:57 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
It seems to me that the test assumes that force acts in the opposite direction of the other force for both questions. Also, if you do the calculation the answer turns out to be negative. Furthermore, force is technically a vector quantity. But I understand your concern about a negative force value and I am a bit puzzled as well.Tesel wrote:I was working on the Raisbeck Aviation test (from the test exchange), and while I made a couple stupid mistakes, I was puzzled by the key for a couple problems. Could anyone look at #19 and #20? I'm not quite sure why the answers would be negative, or how we could know whether to answer them as negative values.
The biologist speculates, "What's the meaning of life?"
The physicist asks, "In the universe, does matter really matter?"
The chemist replies, "I shall find solutions to both questions."
The physicist asks, "In the universe, does matter really matter?"
The chemist replies, "I shall find solutions to both questions."
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
#19 doesn't seem to make sense with a negative number because the force is in the same direction as the velocity, so valid answers are +32 N or 32 N in the direction of the motion, but I think that for #20, the negative sign is meant to indicate that a direction is required, such as -3630 N or 3630 N in the opposite direction the car is going. However, the sigfigs seem to be off (for example, #19 should be 30 N or 3 * 10^1 N, and #20 should be -3600 N or -3.6 * 10^3 N).geniusjohn5 wrote:It seems to me that the test assumes that force acts in the opposite direction of the other force for both questions. Also, if you do the calculation the answer turns out to be negative. Furthermore, force is technically a vector quantity. But I understand your concern about a negative force value and I am a bit puzzled as well.Tesel wrote:I was working on the Raisbeck Aviation test (from the test exchange), and while I made a couple stupid mistakes, I was puzzled by the key for a couple problems. Could anyone look at #19 and #20? I'm not quite sure why the answers would be negative, or how we could know whether to answer them as negative values.
EDIT: Typo with the answers
-
- Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: March 26th, 2017, 5:39 pm
- Division: C
- State: TN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Yes, but most electrical tapes start to melt above 250°F, so make sure you don't have connection points that get hotter than that.404ic wrote:Is it okay if I use electrical tape to insulate the wire connections?reed303 wrote:S-O Battery policy says:404ic wrote:Hi y'all,
Am I allowed to use alligator clips to wire my hovercraft? I remember some team getting chewed out last year for doing that...
• insulate the battery terminals and attached wires when not connected;
• do not use bare wire at any time in the construction of your device;
• make sure that all wiring connections are properly insulated
https://www.soinc.org/sites/default/fil ... _18_17.pdf
We've soldered & shrink-tubed some connections, and used wire nuts for others.. You could also use crimp connectors for wire-to-wire splices. The connections to lugs on motors and switches were soldered.
Last edited by NilaiVemula on March 1st, 2018, 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
White Station High School
2018: (Invitationals/Regionals/State/Nationals)
Hovercraft: (3/1/-/-)
Thermodynamics: (3/1/-/-)
Mission Possible: (4/2/-/-)
Remote Sensing: (1/1/-/-)
Microbe Mission: (1/1/-/-)
Dynamic Planet: (1/1/-/-)
2018: (Invitationals/Regionals/State/Nationals)
Hovercraft: (3/1/-/-)
Thermodynamics: (3/1/-/-)
Mission Possible: (4/2/-/-)
Remote Sensing: (1/1/-/-)
Microbe Mission: (1/1/-/-)
Dynamic Planet: (1/1/-/-)
-
- Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: March 26th, 2017, 5:39 pm
- Division: C
- State: TN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
What are some effective ways to prevent your hovercraft from turning 90 degrees halfway through the run and getting stuck?
White Station High School
2018: (Invitationals/Regionals/State/Nationals)
Hovercraft: (3/1/-/-)
Thermodynamics: (3/1/-/-)
Mission Possible: (4/2/-/-)
Remote Sensing: (1/1/-/-)
Microbe Mission: (1/1/-/-)
Dynamic Planet: (1/1/-/-)
2018: (Invitationals/Regionals/State/Nationals)
Hovercraft: (3/1/-/-)
Thermodynamics: (3/1/-/-)
Mission Possible: (4/2/-/-)
Remote Sensing: (1/1/-/-)
Microbe Mission: (1/1/-/-)
Dynamic Planet: (1/1/-/-)
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Basic solution is to have the hovercraft hug the side rail of the track. More complex solution could be to use bearings on the front corners of the hovercraft to reduce turning. I'm not sure which would be more reliable as I haven't really tested bearings yet.NilaiVemula wrote:What are some effective ways to prevent your hovercraft from turning 90 degrees halfway through the run and getting stuck?
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hovercraft B/C
That makes sense to me... sometimes it's difficult to tell due to the wording, but I can't disagree with your interpretation. 20 just asks for average force, so obviously a negative force would be necessary. 19 asks the average force applied to the pillow, which I believe would still be positive, since it has opposite sign from the force applied to the ball.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:#19 doesn't seem to make sense with a negative number because the force is in the same direction as the velocity, so valid answers are +32 N or 32 N in the direction of the motion, but I think that for #20, the negative sign is meant to indicate that a direction is required, such as -3630 N or 3630 N in the opposite direction the car is going. However, the sigfigs seem to be off (for example, #19 should be 30 N or 3 * 10^1 N, and #20 should be -3600 N or -3.6 * 10^3 N).geniusjohn5 wrote:It seems to me that the test assumes that force acts in the opposite direction of the other force for both questions. Also, if you do the calculation the answer turns out to be negative. Furthermore, force is technically a vector quantity. But I understand your concern about a negative force value and I am a bit puzzled as well.Tesel wrote:I was working on the Raisbeck Aviation test (from the test exchange), and while I made a couple stupid mistakes, I was puzzled by the key for a couple problems. Could anyone look at #19 and #20? I'm not quite sure why the answers would be negative, or how we could know whether to answer them as negative values.
EDIT: Typo with the answers
As a newbie test-writer and fairly experienced competitor, I wouldn't say sig figs are super important in physics events... I wouldn't take off points for them, and the only tests that have very explicitly stated they would. I think there's a different mentality between chem and physics for sig figs.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests