Scioly.org

dreamingoutloud wrote:I have a question.. for the portion of the test where you had to find the epicenter; what city did you get?

San Diego

eh.

not what we got. >.<
you know how it said lag time at 100? that's where we must've screwed up.

dreamingoutloud wrote:I thought nationals was supposed to be harder than regionals and state...

I can't believe they taught you how to do exponents.

Really? That's kind of sad. I think at nationals at least one of the participants would know exponents. And nats usually is supposed to be harder than the other levels, but sometimes they make it easier. Like this case.

gneissisnice wrote:Yes.
I thought it wasnt terrible. I mean it was tedious, but the event always is.
It seemed to be a somewhat fair representation of questions.

By the way, I was referring to the C division event. I have no idea how the B division was.

I'm disappointed in my finish in Dynamic Planet. I don't know what happened.

Mr. Cool wrote:I'm disappointed in my finish in Dynamic Planet. I don't know what happened.

What place did you get?

Mr. Cool wrote:I'm disappointed in my finish in Dynamic Planet. I don't know what happened.

I don't think any of us knew what happened.

the whole test was just... stoopid. I feel like I've wasted months studying for something way too easy.

Now that I realize it, that was my 6th grade science textbook! Not making it to nats, I felt like I HADN'T devoted enough time, as I was really unprepared at states. My medal was a true phenomenon.

blufoster6 wrote:

Mr. Cool wrote:I'm disappointed in my finish in Dynamic Planet. I don't know what happened.

What place did you get?

27th. I thought I did very well, too.

who was proctoring the test?