Flight B/C
- randomdogonapc
- Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: December 6th, 2022, 7:04 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Flight B/C
Ok, thanks for all the advice. I’ll test the new rubber and see if it’s worth using compared to my current setup(and check my math again).
- pumptato-cat
- Member
- Posts: 245
- Joined: June 15th, 2022, 11:04 am
- Division: C
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
- Contact:
Re: Flight B/C
Hey, can you elaborate on how you "back calculate form linear density"? Currently, I'm cutting blanks of 1.9g and calculating density before tying knots to estimate(I don't have enough o-rings otherwise), and I probably have a 1/5 chance of getting the density I need... Wondering if you do a different method(I don't own a rubber stripper though).jander14indoor wrote: ↑April 10th, 2023, 10:22 pm A nice side benefit for SO, since you typically fly with defined rubber motor mass, knowing the linear density of your pre-cut motors makes it easy to make up a new motor close to the correct mass. Just back calculate from linear density to length for say 2.0 g and cut your motor accordingly. Maybe slightly long, but not much, and then trim to exact weight. Saves a lot of wasted rubber, and a lot of time.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
there are so many types of birds and i enjoy looking at all of them
-
- Coach
- Posts: 613
- Joined: April 24th, 2017, 9:19 am
- Division: B
- State: NM
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: Flight B/C
Cat:
Jeff is simply saying you can calculate a length to cut to get your target mass. For example, lets say you have a piece of rubber that is 35" long, and the mass is 2.6g. The density is 0.0674g/in. Lets say your o-rings are 0.015g each, for 0.030g, and your target mass is 1.995g. Then your target rubber mass is 1.965g, and at 0.0674g/in this is 29.14". So, carefully cut your rubber to this length, slip on the two o-rings, use one of the "zero loss" tying methods, and you should have a loop with o-rings at 1.995g. Note: After breaking in, and wiping down, your rubber will probably be 10-20mg lighter. (Note: your o-rings may differ in weight, this is a hypothetical number)
Rubber motor tying without trimming can be seen here: https://youtu.be/5u4ghL21ij8
Note also that rubber will vary in linear density along its length. So I would cut maybe half an inch long, and then trim down while hanging from a mg scale until you hit your rubber target weight. I always make a wire hanger to hang the rubber under the scale. I have found putting it in a cup or pan on top of the scale can impact scale readings substantially (even over 1/2g) if the rubber was just cut or just wiped (static electricity).
Coach Chuck
Jeff is simply saying you can calculate a length to cut to get your target mass. For example, lets say you have a piece of rubber that is 35" long, and the mass is 2.6g. The density is 0.0674g/in. Lets say your o-rings are 0.015g each, for 0.030g, and your target mass is 1.995g. Then your target rubber mass is 1.965g, and at 0.0674g/in this is 29.14". So, carefully cut your rubber to this length, slip on the two o-rings, use one of the "zero loss" tying methods, and you should have a loop with o-rings at 1.995g. Note: After breaking in, and wiping down, your rubber will probably be 10-20mg lighter. (Note: your o-rings may differ in weight, this is a hypothetical number)
Rubber motor tying without trimming can be seen here: https://youtu.be/5u4ghL21ij8
Note also that rubber will vary in linear density along its length. So I would cut maybe half an inch long, and then trim down while hanging from a mg scale until you hit your rubber target weight. I always make a wire hanger to hang the rubber under the scale. I have found putting it in a cup or pan on top of the scale can impact scale readings substantially (even over 1/2g) if the rubber was just cut or just wiped (static electricity).
Coach Chuck
Last edited by coachchuckaahs on April 11th, 2023, 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Coach, Albuquerque Area Home Schoolers Flying Events
Nationals Results:
2016 C WS 8th place
2018 B WS 2nd place
2018 C Heli Champion
2019 B ELG 3rd place
2019 C WS Champion
AMA Results: 3 AAHS members qualify for US Jr Team in F1D, 4 new youth senior records
Nationals Results:
2016 C WS 8th place
2018 B WS 2nd place
2018 C Heli Champion
2019 B ELG 3rd place
2019 C WS Champion
AMA Results: 3 AAHS members qualify for US Jr Team in F1D, 4 new youth senior records
- randomdogonapc
- Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: December 6th, 2022, 7:04 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Flight B/C
Hi!
Now that a lot of regionals and all invites are over, I was wondering if anyone is willing to share flight times from your competitions. I’ll start.
Central Ohio Regional the top flight time was a 2:43 Div C and a 2:06 Div B (Ceiling 53 feet but only flyable 45-42 ish feet)
West Liberty Invite the top div B flight time was a 2:46 Div B(Ceiling 28ft)
Now that a lot of regionals and all invites are over, I was wondering if anyone is willing to share flight times from your competitions. I’ll start.
Central Ohio Regional the top flight time was a 2:43 Div C and a 2:06 Div B (Ceiling 53 feet but only flyable 45-42 ish feet)
West Liberty Invite the top div B flight time was a 2:46 Div B(Ceiling 28ft)
- These users thanked the author randomdogonapc for the post:
- pumptato-cat (April 17th, 2023, 10:43 am)
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: January 2nd, 2020, 5:42 pm
- Division: B
- State: PA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Flight B/C
Southwest Pennsylvania Regional(16ft ceiling, AC on, conference room) won by a 1:55 flight in Div B and I think 1:30 in Div C.
“There are more things to alarm us than to harm us, and we suffer more often in apprehension than reality.” – Seneca
Nats 2022:
3rd EXPD!!
5th Electric Wright Stuff
5th Sounds of Music
Nats 2022:
3rd EXPD!!
5th Electric Wright Stuff
5th Sounds of Music
- pumptato-cat
- Member
- Posts: 245
- Joined: June 15th, 2022, 11:04 am
- Division: C
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
- Contact:
Re: Flight B/C
Was AC on for any of these competitions?randomdogonapc wrote: ↑April 17th, 2023, 9:58 am Hi!
Now that a lot of regionals and all invites are over, I was wondering if anyone is willing to share flight times from your competitions. I’ll start.
Central Ohio Regional the top flight time was a 2:43 Div C and a 2:06 Div B (Ceiling 53 feet but only flyable 45-42 ish feet)
West Liberty Invite the top div B flight time was a 2:46 Div B(Ceiling 28ft)
Also, thank you so much for this information! It's very helpful, as I haven't gone to my State competition and am very stressed.
there are so many types of birds and i enjoy looking at all of them
- randomdogonapc
- Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: December 6th, 2022, 7:04 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Flight B/C
pumptato-cat wrote: ↑April 17th, 2023, 10:44 amNope!Was AC on for any of these competitions?
Also, thank you so much for this information! It's very helpful, as I haven't gone to my State competition and am very stressed.
Last edited by randomdogonapc on April 17th, 2023, 11:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
- randomdogonapc
- Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: December 6th, 2022, 7:04 pm
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Flight B/C
Hi,
So I went flying again today and the wire on my torque meter slipped out of where it was held. I’m using the J&H torque meter, which secures the torque by threading it through two holes in the back. The wire is all bent now. I’m pretty sure it should still work, but not entirely. I can fix the issue with the torque wire slipping, but will a bent torque wire still show the same results?
So I went flying again today and the wire on my torque meter slipped out of where it was held. I’m using the J&H torque meter, which secures the torque by threading it through two holes in the back. The wire is all bent now. I’m pretty sure it should still work, but not entirely. I can fix the issue with the torque wire slipping, but will a bent torque wire still show the same results?
- pumptato-cat
- Member
- Posts: 245
- Joined: June 15th, 2022, 11:04 am
- Division: C
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
- Contact:
Re: Flight B/C
If it helps at all, my FF wire is curved and I haven't noticed a difference in flight.
- These users thanked the author pumptato-cat for the post:
- randomdogonapc (April 18th, 2023, 11:40 am)
there are so many types of birds and i enjoy looking at all of them
-
- Member
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: April 30th, 2007, 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Flight B/C
Well, with SciOly being down for a while, I wasn't able to share the MI state tournament results. So, here we go:
Div B (where I was ES):
Winning time 3:13.5 by MacDonald MS
Second Place 2:39.5 by Meads Mill MS (heading to national tournament)
Third Place 2:38.3 by Clague MS (heading to national tournament)
Two other teams over two minutes
Nine teams between one and two minutes
41 total teams
Only a few teams tiered, again, oversize boxes.
Many partial logs, biggest reason was units!!
AC was on, but you could fly between the events if you set up you plane for a small enough circle and launched in correct spots. Noticeable, but not the worst flying conditions I've seen.
Div C:
Winning time 2:45.3 by East Lansing HS
Second Place 2:29.2 by Holt HS
Third Place 2:12.1 by Novi HS (heading to national tournament)
Five other teams above two minutes
Seventeen teams between one and two minutes
41 total teams
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
Div B (where I was ES):
Winning time 3:13.5 by MacDonald MS
Second Place 2:39.5 by Meads Mill MS (heading to national tournament)
Third Place 2:38.3 by Clague MS (heading to national tournament)
Two other teams over two minutes
Nine teams between one and two minutes
41 total teams
Only a few teams tiered, again, oversize boxes.
Many partial logs, biggest reason was units!!
AC was on, but you could fly between the events if you set up you plane for a small enough circle and launched in correct spots. Noticeable, but not the worst flying conditions I've seen.
Div C:
Winning time 2:45.3 by East Lansing HS
Second Place 2:29.2 by Holt HS
Third Place 2:12.1 by Novi HS (heading to national tournament)
Five other teams above two minutes
Seventeen teams between one and two minutes
41 total teams
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests