Mousetrap Vehicle C

Locked
Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by Rêveur »

Alex-RCHS wrote:
PM2017 wrote:
4Head wrote: It doesn’t really matter. I just used back because it “felt” better.
I was about to say the same thing.
If your lever arm extends beyond the body of the car it may hit/interfere with the cup. To prevent this many teams have the winding axle in the back so by the time the lever arm reaches the front of the car the cup has already been dropped off.
What's the ideal length of a lever arm? Is there a formula?
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

Rêveur wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:
PM2017 wrote: I was about to say the same thing.
If your lever arm extends beyond the body of the car it may hit/interfere with the cup. To prevent this many teams have the winding axle in the back so by the time the lever arm reaches the front of the car the cup has already been dropped off.
What's the ideal length of a lever arm? Is there a formula?
I was going unde rthe assumption that you want to use just under the entire turnf of the lever arm to travel the 3(.05) meters forwards, and the 7(.1) meters back, so that you make the most out of the mousetraps.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

Thoughts on using excessively large attachment holes to save weight, but still use it for attachment?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
antoine_ego
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 387
Joined: May 24th, 2016, 5:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by antoine_ego »

PM2017 wrote:Thoughts on using excessively large attachment holes to save weight, but still use it for attachment?
Most of the weight of the trap is metal, which you can't really alter, so drilling large holes is a bit useless.
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd
2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th
2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th
2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd!
2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
[/b]
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19
4Head
Member
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 11:29 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by 4Head »

antoine_ego wrote:
PM2017 wrote:Thoughts on using excessively large attachment holes to save weight, but still use it for attachment?
Most of the weight of the trap is metal, which you can't really alter, so drilling large holes is a bit useless.
Keyword: most.

Every advantage in this event is going to be small. Even a barely significant change is priceless once youve optimized all the other aspect of your vehicle, especially considering all these small changes added up will be quite dramatic
2019 Sounds of Music National Champion
User avatar
Alex-RCHS
Member
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
Division: Grad
State: NC
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by Alex-RCHS »

4Head wrote:
antoine_ego wrote:
PM2017 wrote:Thoughts on using excessively large attachment holes to save weight, but still use it for attachment?
Most of the weight of the trap is metal, which you can't really alter, so drilling large holes is a bit useless.
Keyword: most.

Every advantage in this event is going to be small. Even a barely significant change is priceless once youve optimized all the other aspect of your vehicle, especially considering all these small changes added up will be quite dramatic
This is an interesting idea, but what are you going to use to attach it? The rules specify that the holes must be for attachment purposes, not just to cut weight. Whatever you use to attach the car will add some extra weight, offsetting some (or most, or all if you use metal screws) of the benefits.

I did some quick calculations and assuming the wood of the mousetrap is .75cm thick and has a density of .75 g/cm^3, and you cut 1.5 cm diameter holes (that's pretty generous IMO) then you're saving 1 gram per hole at most, minus whatever you add to actually attach it.
About me!
Raleigh Charter HS (NC) 2018
UNC-Chapel Hill 2022
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

Alex-RCHS wrote:
4Head wrote:
antoine_ego wrote:
Most of the weight of the trap is metal, which you can't really alter, so drilling large holes is a bit useless.
Keyword: most.

Every advantage in this event is going to be small. Even a barely significant change is priceless once youve optimized all the other aspect of your vehicle, especially considering all these small changes added up will be quite dramatic
This is an interesting idea, but what are you going to use to attach it? The rules specify that the holes must be for attachment purposes, not just to cut weight. Whatever you use to attach the car will add some extra weight, offsetting some (or most, or all if you use metal screws) of the benefits.

I did some quick calculations and assuming the wood of the mousetrap is .75cm thick and has a density of .75 g/cm^3, and you cut 1.5 cm diameter holes (that's pretty generous IMO) then you're saving 1 gram per hole at most, minus whatever you add to actually attach it.
I was going to drill out a 1 in hole, a 1/2 in hole, and two smaller holes, and use a hollow 3d printed cylinder (w/ no top or bottom, and with 0.05 in walls)
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by PM2017 »

Alex-RCHS wrote:
4Head wrote:
antoine_ego wrote:
Most of the weight of the trap is metal, which you can't really alter, so drilling large holes is a bit useless.
Keyword: most.

Every advantage in this event is going to be small. Even a barely significant change is priceless once youve optimized all the other aspect of your vehicle, especially considering all these small changes added up will be quite dramatic
This is an interesting idea, but what are you going to use to attach it? The rules specify that the holes must be for attachment purposes, not just to cut weight. Whatever you use to attach the car will add some extra weight, offsetting some (or most, or all if you use metal screws) of the benefits.

I did some quick calculations and assuming the wood of the mousetrap is .75cm thick and has a density of .75 g/cm^3, and you cut 1.5 cm diameter holes (that's pretty generous IMO) then you're saving 1 gram per hole at most, minus whatever you add to actually attach it.
I was going to drill out a 1 in hole, a 1/2 in hole, and two smaller holes, and use a hollow 3d printed cylinder (w/ no top or bottom, and with 0.05 in walls)
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
Alex-RCHS
Member
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
Division: Grad
State: NC
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by Alex-RCHS »

PM2017 wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:
4Head wrote: Keyword: most.

Every advantage in this event is going to be small. Even a barely significant change is priceless once youve optimized all the other aspect of your vehicle, especially considering all these small changes added up will be quite dramatic
This is an interesting idea, but what are you going to use to attach it? The rules specify that the holes must be for attachment purposes, not just to cut weight. Whatever you use to attach the car will add some extra weight, offsetting some (or most, or all if you use metal screws) of the benefits.

I did some quick calculations and assuming the wood of the mousetrap is .75cm thick and has a density of .75 g/cm^3, and you cut 1.5 cm diameter holes (that's pretty generous IMO) then you're saving 1 gram per hole at most, minus whatever you add to actually attach it.
I was going to drill out a 1 in hole, a 1/2 in hole, and two smaller holes, and use a hollow 3d printed cylinder (w/ no top or bottom, and with 0.05 in walls)
Still saves about 4g in total, minus the mass of the cylinder. Whatever floats your boat lol
About me!
Raleigh Charter HS (NC) 2018
UNC-Chapel Hill 2022
biz11
Member
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: February 15th, 2015, 10:55 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C

Post by biz11 »

The back wheels of my car keep just lifting up slightly+not getting enough traction and so the car doesn’t move at all but the axle turns. Any solutions for this?
I’m using cd’s with balloons as the tires.
Mount Nittany MS (2014-2017)
State College HS (2017-2020)
Penn State (2020-2024)
Locked

Return to “Mousetrap Vehicle C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests